- It's obvious that addresses are needed to add contacts, so `_by_address_list` looks excessive.
- The function only looks up `SELF` by address.
- The name was confusing because there's also `lookup_key_contacts_by_address_list()` that actually
looks up key contacts by addresses (not only `SELF`).
- Added import-vcard and make-vcard commands to deltachat-repl. These
wrap the corresponding import_vcard() and make_vcard() operations from
src/contact.rs. Each command takes a file path argument specifying the
location of the vCard file to be read or written. The make-vcard command
takes one or more IDs to write to the file.
- Documented commands in "Using the CLI client" section of README.md.
Co-authored-by: iequidoo <117991069+iequidoo@users.noreply.github.com>
The info will look like:
```
debug_assertions=On - DO NOT RELEASE THIS BUILD
```
or:
```
debug_assertions=Off
```
I tested that this actually works when compiling on Android.
<details><summary>This is how it looked before the second
commit</summary>
<p>
The deltachat_core_version line in the info will look like:
```
deltachat_core_version=v2.5.0 [debug build]
```
or:
```
deltachat_core_version=v2.5.0 [release build]
```
I tested that this actually works when compiling on Android.
</p>
</details>
This adds a test for https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/7032/.
The crash happened if you received a message that has the from contact
also in the "To: " and "Chat-Group-Member-Fpr: " headers. Not sure how
it happened that such a message was created; I managed to create one in
a test, but needed to access some internals of MimeFactory for that.
I then saved the email that is sent by Alice into the test-data
directory, and then made a test that Bob doesn't crash if he receives
this email. And as a sanity-check, also test that Bob marks Fiona as
verified after receiving this email.
Sort recipients by `add_timestamp DESC` so that if the group is large and there are multiple SMTP
messages, a newly added member receives the member addition message earlier and has gossiped keys of
other members (otherwise the new member may receive messages from other members earlier and fail to
verify them).
This PR adds a test to reproduce a bug raised by @adbenitez that peer
channels break when the resend feature is used.
---------
Co-authored-by: iequidoo <dgreshilov@gmail.com>
This should fix https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/7030; @r10s if
you could test whether it fixes your problem
The crash happened if you received a message that has the from contact
also in the "To: " and "Chat-Group-Member-Fpr: " headers. Not sure how
it happened that such a message was created.
Previously, chat protection was only removed if the chat became an
email-chat because the key-contact has a different email, but not if the
chat became an email-chat for a different reason.
Therefore, it could happen that the migration produced a protected,
unencrypted chat, where you couldn't write any messages.
I tested that applying this fix actually fixes the bug I had.
tokio-io-timeout 1.2.0 used previously
did not reset the timeout when returning
timeout error. This resulted
in infinite loop spamming
the log with messages that look like this and using 100% CPU:
Read error on stream 192.168.1.20:993 after reading 9118 and writing 1036 bytes: timed out.
Read error on stream 192.168.1.20:993 after reading 9118 and writing 1036 bytes: timed out.
Read error on stream 192.168.1.20:993 after reading 9118 and writing 1036 bytes: timed out.
Read error on stream 192.168.1.20:993 after reading 9118 and writing 1036 bytes: timed out.
Read error on stream 192.168.1.20:993 after reading 9118 and writing 1036 bytes: timed out.
Read error on stream 192.168.1.20:993 after reading 9118 and writing 1036 bytes: timed out.
Normally these messages should be separated by at least 1 minute timeout.
The reason for infinite loop is not figured out yet,
but this change should at least fix 100% CPU usage.
See <https://github.com/sfackler/tokio-io-timeout/issues/13>
for the bugreport and
<https://github.com/sfackler/tokio-io-timeout/pull/14>
for the bugfix.
Socket may lose peer address when it is disconnected from
the server side. In this case debug_assert! failed
for me when running the core in debug mode on desktop.
To avoid the case of peer_addr not being available,
we now store it when LoggingStream is created.
this PR adds a info message "messages are end-to-end-encrypted" also for
chats created by eg. vcards. by the removal of lock icons, this is a
good place to hint for that in addition; this is also what eg. whatsapp
and others are doing
the wording itself is tweaked at
https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/pull/3817 (and there is
also the rough idea to make the message a little more outstanding, by
some more dedicated colors)
~~did not test in practise, if this leads to double "e2ee info messages"
on secure join, tests look good, however.~~ EDIT: did lots of practise
tests meanwhile :)
most of the changes in this PR are about test ...
ftr, in another PR, after 2.0 reeases, there could probably quite some
code cleanup wrt set-protection, protection-disabled etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
- After the revisions to support key contacts, the 'listcontacts'
command in the repl only lists key-contacts. A separate flag now
has to be passed to Contact::get_all() to list address contacts.
This makes it difficult to run the example in README.md because we
need to see the new contact so we can get its ID for the next
command in the example, that creates a chat by ID.
- Revised 'listcontacts' command to make a second call to
Contact::get_all() with the DC_GCL_ADDRESS flag, then print the
e-mail contacts after the key contacts.
- Revised configuration example in top-level README.md to reflect
current command output.
fixes#7011
Delta Chat always adds protected headers to the inner encrypted or signed message, so if a protected
header is only present in the outer part, it should be ignored because it's probably added by the
server or somebody else. The exceptions are Subject and List-ID because there are known cases when
they are only present in the outer message part.
Also treat any Chat-* headers as protected. This fixes e.g. a case when the server injects a
"Chat-Version" IMF header tricking Delta Chat into thinking that it's a chat message.
Also handle "Auto-Submitted" and "Autocrypt-Setup-Message" as protected headers on the receiver
side, this was apparently forgotten.
Headers are normally added at the top of the message,
e.g. when forwarding new `Received` headers are
added at the top.
When headers are protected with DKIM-Signature
and oversigning is not used,
forged headers may be added on top
so headers from the top are generally less trustworthy.
This is tested with `test_take_last_header`,
but so far last header was only preferred
for known headers. This change extends
preference of the last header to all headers.
