feat: Also lookup key contacts in lookup_id_by_addr() (#7073)

If there is both a key and an address contact, return the most recently
seen one.
This commit is contained in:
Hocuri
2025-08-04 21:32:09 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 8fe3ce5cab
commit 93241a4beb
10 changed files with 102 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@@ -2089,9 +2089,19 @@ int dc_may_be_valid_addr (const char* addr);
/**
* Check if an e-mail address belongs to a known and unblocked contact.
* Looks up a known and unblocked contact with a given e-mail address.
* To get a list of all known and unblocked contacts, use dc_get_contacts().
*
* **POTENTIAL SECURITY ISSUE**: If there are multiple contacts with this address
* (e.g. an address-contact and a key-contact),
* this looks up the most recently seen contact,
* i.e. which contact is returned depends on which contact last sent a message.
* If the user just clicked on a mailto: link, then this is the best thing you can do.
* But **DO NOT** internally represent contacts by their email address
* and do not use this function to look them up;
* otherwise this function will sometimes look up the wrong contact.
* Instead, you should internally represent contacts by their ids.
*
* To validate an e-mail address independently of the contact database
* use dc_may_be_valid_addr().
*
@@ -2113,6 +2123,13 @@ uint32_t dc_lookup_contact_id_by_addr (dc_context_t* context, const char*
* To add a number of contacts, see dc_add_address_book() which is much faster for adding
* a bunch of addresses.
*
* This will always create or look up an address-contact,
* i.e. a contact identified by an email address,
* with all messages sent to and from this contact being unencrypted.
* If the user just clicked on an email address,
* you should first check `lookup_contact_id_by_addr`,
* and only if there is no contact yet, call this function here.
*
* May result in a #DC_EVENT_CONTACTS_CHANGED event.
*
* @memberof dc_context_t

View File

@@ -1473,7 +1473,14 @@ impl CommandApi {
/// Add a single contact as a result of an explicit user action.
///
/// Returns contact id of the created or existing contact
/// This will always create or look up an address-contact,
/// i.e. a contact identified by an email address,
/// with all messages sent to and from this contact being unencrypted.
/// If the user just clicked on an email address,
/// you should first check [`Self::lookup_contact_id_by_addr`]/`lookupContactIdByAddr.`,
/// and only if there is no contact yet, call this function here.
///
/// Returns contact id of the created or existing contact.
async fn create_contact(
&self,
account_id: u32,
@@ -1623,9 +1630,19 @@ impl CommandApi {
Contact::get_encrinfo(&ctx, ContactId::new(contact_id)).await
}
/// Check if an e-mail address belongs to a known and unblocked contact.
/// Looks up a known and unblocked contact with a given e-mail address.
/// To get a list of all known and unblocked contacts, use contacts_get_contacts().
///
/// **POTENTIAL SECURITY ISSUE**: If there are multiple contacts with this address
/// (e.g. an address-contact and a key-contact),
/// this looks up the most recently seen contact,
/// i.e. which contact is returned depends on which contact last sent a message.
/// If the user just clicked on a mailto: link, then this is the best thing you can do.
/// But **DO NOT** internally represent contacts by their email address
/// and do not use this function to look them up;
/// otherwise this function will sometimes look up the wrong contact.
/// Instead, you should internally represent contacts by their ids.
///
/// To validate an e-mail address independently of the contact database
/// use check_email_validity().
async fn lookup_contact_id_by_addr(

View File

@@ -185,7 +185,21 @@ class Account:
return Contact(self, contact_id)
def get_contact_by_addr(self, address: str) -> Optional[Contact]:
"""Check if an e-mail address belongs to a known and unblocked contact."""
"""Looks up a known and unblocked contact with a given e-mail address.
To get a list of all known and unblocked contacts, use contacts_get_contacts().
**POTENTIAL SECURITY ISSUE**: If there are multiple contacts with this address
(e.g. an address-contact and a key-contact),
this looks up the most recently seen contact,
i.e. which contact is returned depends on which contact last sent a message.
If the user just clicked on a mailto: link, then this is the best thing you can do.
But **DO NOT** internally represent contacts by their email address
and do not use this function to look them up;
otherwise this function will sometimes look up the wrong contact.
Instead, you should internally represent contacts by their ids.
To validate an e-mail address independently of the contact database
use check_email_validity()."""
contact_id = self._rpc.lookup_contact_id_by_addr(self.id, address)
return contact_id and Contact(self, contact_id)

View File

@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ def test_account(acfactory) -> None:
assert alice.get_size()
assert alice.is_configured()
assert not alice.get_avatar()
assert alice.get_contact_by_addr(bob_addr) is None # There is no address-contact, only key-contact
# get_contact_by_addr() can lookup a key contact by address:
bob_contact = alice.get_contact_by_addr(bob_addr).get_snapshot()
assert bob_contact.display_name == "Bob"
assert bob_contact.is_key_contact
assert alice.get_contacts()
assert alice.get_contacts(snapshot=True)
assert alice.self_contact

View File

@@ -330,7 +330,21 @@ class Account:
return bool(lib.dc_delete_contact(self._dc_context, contact_id))
def get_contact_by_addr(self, email: str) -> Optional[Contact]:
"""get a contact for the email address or None if it's blocked or doesn't exist."""
"""Looks up a known and unblocked contact with a given e-mail address.
To get a list of all known and unblocked contacts, use contacts_get_contacts().
**POTENTIAL SECURITY ISSUE**: If there are multiple contacts with this address
(e.g. an address-contact and a key-contact),
this looks up the most recently seen contact,
i.e. which contact is returned depends on which contact last sent a message.
If the user just clicked on a mailto: link, then this is the best thing you can do.
But **DO NOT** internally represent contacts by their email address
and do not use this function to look them up;
otherwise this function will sometimes look up the wrong contact.
Instead, you should internally represent contacts by their ids.
To validate an e-mail address independently of the contact database
use check_email_validity()."""
_, addr = parseaddr(email)
addr = as_dc_charpointer(addr)
contact_id = lib.dc_lookup_contact_id_by_addr(self._dc_context, addr)

View File

@@ -755,7 +755,19 @@ impl Contact {
self.is_bot
}
/// Check if an e-mail address belongs to a known and unblocked contact.
/// Looks up a known and unblocked contact with a given e-mail address.
/// To get a list of all known and unblocked contacts, use contacts_get_contacts().
///
///
/// **POTENTIAL SECURITY ISSUE**: If there are multiple contacts with this address
/// (e.g. an address-contact and a key-contact),
/// this looks up the most recently seen contact,
/// i.e. which contact is returned depends on which contact last sent a message.
/// If the user just clicked on a mailto: link, then this is the best thing you can do.
/// But **DO NOT** internally represent contacts by their email address
/// and do not use this function to look them up;
/// otherwise this function will sometimes look up the wrong contact.
/// Instead, you should internally represent contacts by their ids.
///
/// Known and unblocked contacts will be returned by `get_contacts()`.
///
@@ -795,8 +807,8 @@ impl Contact {
.query_get_value(
"SELECT id FROM contacts
WHERE addr=?1 COLLATE NOCASE
AND fingerprint='' -- Do not lookup key-contacts
AND id>?2 AND origin>=?3 AND (? OR blocked=?)",
AND id>?2 AND origin>=?3 AND (? OR blocked=?)
ORDER BY last_seen DESC LIMIT 1",
(
&addr_normalized,
ContactId::LAST_SPECIAL,

View File

@@ -1072,6 +1072,7 @@ async fn test_sync_create() -> Result<()> {
.unwrap();
let a1b_contact = Contact::get_by_id(alice1, a1b_contact_id).await?;
assert_eq!(a1b_contact.name, "Bob");
assert_eq!(a1b_contact.is_key_contact(), false);
Contact::create(alice0, "Bob Renamed", "bob@example.net").await?;
test_utils::sync(alice0, alice1).await;
@@ -1081,6 +1082,7 @@ async fn test_sync_create() -> Result<()> {
assert_eq!(id, a1b_contact_id);
let a1b_contact = Contact::get_by_id(alice1, a1b_contact_id).await?;
assert_eq!(a1b_contact.name, "Bob Renamed");
assert_eq!(a1b_contact.is_key_contact(), false);
Ok(())
}

View File

@@ -683,6 +683,7 @@ async fn test_selfavatar_unencrypted_signed() {
.unwrap()
.unwrap();
let alice_contact = Contact::get_by_id(&bob.ctx, alice_id).await.unwrap();
assert_eq!(alice_contact.is_key_contact(), false);
assert!(
alice_contact
.get_profile_image(&bob.ctx)

View File

@@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ async fn test_other_device_writes_to_mailinglist() -> Result<()> {
.await?
.unwrap();
let list_post_contact = Contact::get_by_id(&t, list_post_contact_id).await?;
assert_eq!(list_post_contact.is_key_contact(), false);
assert_eq!(
list_post_contact.param.get(Param::ListId).unwrap(),
"delta.codespeak.net"
@@ -1453,6 +1454,7 @@ async fn test_apply_mailinglist_changes_assigned_by_reply() {
.unwrap()
.unwrap();
let contact = Contact::get_by_id(&t, contact_id).await.unwrap();
assert_eq!(contact.is_key_contact(), false);
assert_eq!(
contact.param.get(Param::ListId).unwrap(),
"deltachat-core-rust.deltachat.github.com"
@@ -3682,10 +3684,13 @@ async fn test_mua_user_adds_recipient_to_single_chat() -> Result<()> {
chat::get_chat_contacts(&alice, group_chat.id).await?.len(),
4
);
let fiona = Contact::lookup_id_by_addr(&alice, "fiona@example.net", Origin::IncomingTo)
.await?
.unwrap();
assert!(chat::is_contact_in_chat(&alice, group_chat.id, fiona).await?);
let fiona_contact_id =
Contact::lookup_id_by_addr(&alice, "fiona@example.net", Origin::IncomingTo)
.await?
.unwrap();
assert!(chat::is_contact_in_chat(&alice, group_chat.id, fiona_contact_id).await?);
let fiona_contact = Contact::get_by_id(&alice, fiona_contact_id).await?;
assert_eq!(fiona_contact.is_key_contact(), false);
Ok(())
}

View File

@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ async fn test_key_contacts_migration_autocrypt() -> Result<()> {
.await?
.unwrap();
let email_bob = Contact::get_by_id(&t, email_bob_id).await?;
assert_eq!(email_bob.is_key_contact(), false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.origin, Origin::Hidden); // Email bob is in no chats, so, contact is hidden
assert_eq!(email_bob.e2ee_avail(&t).await?, false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.fingerprint(), None);
@@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ async fn test_key_contacts_migration_email1() -> Result<()> {
.await?
.unwrap();
let email_bob = Contact::get_by_id(&t, email_bob_id).await?;
assert_eq!(email_bob.is_key_contact(), false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.origin, Origin::OutgoingTo);
assert_eq!(email_bob.e2ee_avail(&t).await?, false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.fingerprint(), None);
@@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ async fn test_key_contacts_migration_email2() -> Result<()> {
.await?
.unwrap();
let email_bob = Contact::get_by_id(&t, email_bob_id).await?;
assert_eq!(email_bob.is_key_contact(), false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.origin, Origin::OutgoingTo); // Email bob is in no chats, so, contact is hidden
assert_eq!(email_bob.e2ee_avail(&t).await?, false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.fingerprint(), None);
@@ -148,6 +151,7 @@ async fn test_key_contacts_migration_verified() -> Result<()> {
.unwrap();
let email_bob = Contact::get_by_id(&t, email_bob_id).await?;
dbg!(&email_bob);
assert_eq!(email_bob.is_key_contact(), false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.origin, Origin::Hidden); // Email bob is in no chats, so, contact is hidden
assert_eq!(email_bob.e2ee_avail(&t).await?, false);
assert_eq!(email_bob.fingerprint(), None);