This partially restores the fix from c9cf2b7f2e
that was removed during the addition of new group consistency at de63527d94
but only for "Member added" messages.
Multiple "Member added" messages happen
when the same QR code is processed multiple times
by multiple devices.
Some migrations change the `config` table, but they don't update the
cache. While this wasn't the cause for
https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/6432, it might
have caused a similar bug, so, let's clear the config cache after every
migration.
Users report that in a setup with Android (1.50.4 from F-Droid) and Desktop (1.48.0 x86_64 .deb
release) and chatmail account `bcc_self` was reverted to 0 on Android, resulting in messages sent
from Android not appearing on Desktop. This might happen because of the bug in migration #127, it
doesn't handle `delete_server_after` > 1. Existing chatmail configurations having
`delete_server_after` != 1 ("delete at once") should get `bcc_self` enabled, they may be multidevice
configurations:
- Before migration #127, `delete_server_after` was set to 0 upon a backup export, but
then `bcc_self` is enabled instead (whose default is changed to 0 for chatmail).
- The user might set `delete_server_after` to a value other than 0 or 1 when that was
possible in UIs.
So let's add another migration fixing this. But still don't check `is_chatmail` for simplicity.
Using `repeat_vars()` to generate SQL statements led to some of them having more than
`SQLITE_MAX_VARIABLE_NUMBER` parameters and thus failing, so let's get rid of this pattern. But
let's not optimise for now and just repeat executing an SQL statement in a loop, all the places
where `repeat_vars()` is used seem not performance-critical and containing functions execute other
SQL statements in loops. If needed, performance can be improved by preparing a statement and
executing it in a loop. An exception is `lookup_chat_or_create_adhoc_group()` where `repeat_vars()`
can't be replaced with a query loop, there we need to replace the `SELECT` query with a read
transaction creating a temporary table which is used to perform the SELECT query then.
Before, `Chat::why_cant_send()` just returned `CantSendReason` after the first unsuccessful check
allowing to handle the result and finally send the message if the condition is acceptable in which
case the remaining checks are not done. This didn't result in any bugs, but to make the code more
robust let's add a functional parameter to filter failed checks without early return.
This implements new group consistency algorithm described in
<https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/6401>
New `Chat-Group-Member-Timestamps` header is added
to send timestamps of member additions and removals.
Member is part of the chat if its addition timestamp
is greater or equal to the removal timestamp.
Python 3.7 is not supported on GitHub Actions ubuntu-latest runner:
https://github.com/actions/setup-python/issues/962
Python 3.7 has reached EOL more than 1 year ago anyway,
so not worth the effort supporting it.
This test keeps failing on macOS CI,
capturing events like `DC_EVENT_ACCOUNTS_ITEM_CHANGED`
before FailPlugin is setup.
These CI runners likely get less resources
because there is a limited number of them,
and this triggers this race condition.
Race is fixed by setting up fail plugin
before starting to capture events.
Currently Delta Chat puts self address in the To field
to avoid the To field being empty.
There is a plan to put empty `hidden-recipients`
group there, this fix prepares the receiver for such messages.
New Delta Chat is going to send self-sent messages
with undisclosed recipients instead of placing self into the `To` field.
To avoid assigning broadcast list messages to Saved Messages chat,
we should check the mailing list headers
before attempting to assign to Saved Messages.
First of all, chatmail servers normally forbid to send unencrypted mail, so if we know the peer's
key, we should encrypt to it. Chatmail setups have `E2eeEnabled=1` by default and this isn't
possible to change in UIs, so this change fixes the chatmail case. Additionally, for chatmail, if a
peer has `EncryptPreference::Reset`, let's handle it as `EncryptPreference::NoPreference` for the
reason above. Still, if `E2eeEnabled` is 0 for a chatmail setup somehow, e.g. the user set it via
environment, let's assume that the user knows what they do and ignore `IsChatmail` flag.
NB:
- If we don't know the peer's key, we should try to send an unencrypted message as before for a
chatmail setup.
- This change doesn't remove the "majority rule", but now the majority with
`EncryptPreference::NoPreference` can't disable encryption if the local preference is `Mutual`. To
disable encryption, some peer should have a missing peerstate or, for the non-chatmail case, the
majority should have `EncryptPreference::Reset`.
