We use query_and_then() instead of query_map() function now.
The difference is that row processing function
returns anyhow::Result, so simple fallible processing
like JSON parsing can be done inside of it
when calling query_map_vec() and query_map_collect()
without having to resort to query_map()
and iterating over all rows again afterwards.
If we use modules (which are actually namespaces), we can use shorter names. Another approach is to
only use modules for internal code incapsulation and use full names like deltachat-ffi does.
Create unprotected group in test_create_protected_grp_multidev
The test is renamed accordingly.
SystemMessage::ChatE2ee is added in encrypted groups
regardless of whether they are protected or not.
Previously new encrypted unprotected groups
had no message saying that messages are end-to-end encrypted
at all.
Part of #6884
----
- [x] Add new chat type `InBroadcastChannel` and `OutBroadcastChannel`
for incoming / outgoing channels, where the former is similar to a
`Mailinglist` and the latter is similar to a `Broadcast` (which is
removed)
- Consideration for naming: `InChannel`/`OutChannel` (without
"broadcast") would be shorter, but less greppable because we already
have a lot of occurences of `channel` in the code. Consistently calling
them `BcChannel`/`bc_channel` in the code would be both short and
greppable, but a bit arcane when reading it at first. Opinions are
welcome; if I hear none, I'll keep with `BroadcastChannel`.
- [x] api: Add create_broadcast_channel(), deprecate
create_broadcast_list() (or `create_channel()` / `create_bc_channel()`
if we decide to switch)
- Adjust code comments to match the new behavior.
- [x] Ask Desktop developers what they use `is_broadcast` field for, and
whether it should be true for both outgoing & incoming channels (or look
it up myself)
- I added `is_out_broadcast_channel`, and deprecated `is_broadcast`, for
now
- [x] When the user changes the broadcast channel name, immediately show
this change on receiving devices
- [x] Allow to change brodacast channel avatar, and immediately apply it
on the receiving device
- [x] Make it possible to block InBroadcastChannel
- [x] Make it possible to set the avatar of an OutgoingChannel, and
apply it on the receiving side
- [x] DECIDE whether we still want to use the broadcast icon as the
default icon or whether we want to use the letter-in-a-circle
- We decided to use the letter-in-a-circle for now, because it's easier
to implement, and I need to stay in the time plan
- [x] chat.rs: Return an error if the user tries to modify a
`InBroadcastChannel`
- [x] Add automated regression tests
- [x] Grep for `broadcast` and see whether there is any other work I
need to do
- [x] Bug: Don't show `~` in front of the sender's same in broadcast
lists
----
Note that I removed the following guard:
```rust
if !new_chat_contacts.contains(&ContactId::SELF) {
warn!(
context,
"Received group avatar update for group chat {} we are not a member of.", chat.id
);
} else if !new_chat_contacts.contains(&from_id) {
warn!(
context,
"Contact {from_id} attempts to modify group chat {} avatar without being a member.",
chat.id,
);
} else [...]
```
i.e. with this change, non-members will be able to modify the avatar.
Things were slightly easier this way, and I think that this is in line
with non-members being able to modify the group name and memberlist
(they need to know the Group-Chat-Id, anyway), but I can also change it
back.
This change introduces a new type of contacts
identified by their public key fingerprint
rather than an e-mail address.
Encrypted chats now stay encrypted
and unencrypted chats stay unencrypted.
For example, 1:1 chats with key-contacts
are encrypted and 1:1 chats with address-contacts
are unencrypted.
Groups that have a group ID are encrypted
and can only contain key-contacts
while groups that don't have a group ID ("adhoc groups")
are unencrypted and can only contain address-contacts.
JSON-RPC API `reset_contact_encryption` is removed.
Python API `Contact.reset_encryption` is removed.
"Group tracking plugin" in legacy Python API was removed because it
relied on parsing email addresses from system messages with regexps.
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: iequidoo <dgreshilov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: B. Petersen <r10s@b44t.com>
This implements new group consistency algorithm described in
<https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/6401>
New `Chat-Group-Member-Timestamps` header is added
to send timestamps of member additions and removals.
Member is part of the chat if its addition timestamp
is greater or equal to the removal timestamp.
shows the last reaction in chatlist's summaries if there is no
newer message.
the reason to show reactions in the summary, is to make them a _little_
more visible when one is not in the chat. esp. in not-so-chatty or in
one-to-ones chats this becomes handy: imaging a question and someone
"answers" with "thumbs up" ...
otoh, reactions are still tuned down on purpose: no notifications, chats
are opend as usual, the chatlist is not sorted by reactions and also the
date in the summary refer to the last message - i thought quite a bit
about that, this seems to be good compromise and will raise the fewest
questions. it is somehow clear to the users that reactions are not the
same as a real message. also, it is comparable easy to implement - no
UI changes required :)
all that is very close to what whatsapp is doing (figured that out by
quite some testing ... to cite @adbenitez: if in doubt, we can blame
whatsapp :)
technically, i first wanted to go for the "big solution" and add two
more columns, chat_id and timestamp, however, it seemed a bit bloated if
we really only need the last one. therefore, i just added the last
reaction information to the chat's param, which seems more performant
but also easier to code :)
I.e. exclude from the list the following chats as well:
- Read-only mailing lists.
- Chats we're not a member of.
But as for ProtectionBroken chats, we return them, as that may happen to a verified chat at any
time. It may be confusing if a chat that is normally in the list disappears suddenly. The UI need to
deal with that case anyway.
(cherry picked from commit 83ef25e7de)
I.e. exclude from the list the following chats as well:
- Read-only mailing lists.
- Chats we're not a member of.
But as for ProtectionBroken chats, we return them, as that may happen to a verified chat at any
time. It may be confusing if a chat that is normally in the list disappears suddenly. The UI need to
deal with that case anyway.
Message.set_text() and Message.get_text() are modified accordingly
to accept String and return String.
Messages which previously contained None text
are now represented as messages with empty text.
Use Message.set_text("".to_string())
instead of Message.set_text(None).
Why? because desktop currently fetches the chatlist multiple times, even though it just needs the
chatlistitem for one chat.
Note: @r10s was worried before that exposing the method to get a single updated chatlistitem could
lead to race conditions where the chatlist item is newer than the chatlist order. But I don't think
this will change anything for desktop besides making it a little faster (because currently desktop
fetches the whole chatlist instead of just the entry it needs when an entry updates).
Moved custom ToSql trait including Send + Sync from lib.rs to sql.rs.
Replaced most params! and paramsv! macro usage with tuples.
Replaced paramsv! and params_iterv! with params_slice!,
because there is no need to construct a vector.
* move 'archived link' betweeen pinned and normal cahts or above normal chats
* add icon for 'archived chats' link
* let get_fresh_msg_cnt() work for DC_CHAT_ID_ARCHIVED_LINK
* move 'archived link' topmost
* use less noticeable archived-icon
* slightly smaller archived icon
* update CHANGELOG
* Do ephemeral deletion in background loop
1. in start_io start ephemeral async task, in stop_io cancel ephemeral async task
2. start ephemeral async task which loops like this:
- wait until next time a message deletion is needed or an interrupt occurs (see 3.)
- perform delete_expired_messages including sending MSGS_CHANGED events
3. on new messages (incoming or outgoing) with ephemeral timer:
- interrupt ephemeral async task
* Changelog
* Fix and improve test
* no return value needed
* address @link2xt review comments
* slight normalization: have only one place where we wait for interrupt_receiver
* simplify sql statement -- and don't exit the ephemeral_task if there is an sql problem but rather wait
* Remove now-unused `ephemeral_task` JoinHandle
The JoinHandle is now inside the Scheduler.
* fix clippy
* Revert accidental move of the line
* Add log
Co-authored-by: holger krekel <holger@merlinux.eu>
Co-authored-by: link2xt <link2xt@testrun.org>
This makes the contact ID its own newtype instead of being a plain
u32. The change purposefully does not yet try and reap any benefits
from this yet, instead aiming for a boring change that's easy to
review. Only exception is the ToSql/FromSql as not doing that yet
would also have created churn in the database code and it is easier to
go straight for the right solution here.
- Replace .ok_or_else() and .map_err() with anyhow::Context where possible.
- Use .context() to check Option for None when it's an error
- Resultify Chatlist.get_chat_id()
- Add useful .context() to some errors
- IMAP error handling cleanup
`imap` table maps Message-IDs to UIDs on the server. `dc_receive_imf`
no longer gets the UID of the message as an argument and does not
insert the folder and UID of the message into the `msgs`
table. `server_folder` and `server_uid` columns in `msgs` table are
deprecated.
MoveMsg and DeleteMsgOnImap jobs are removed. Now messages are moved
and deleted only in the `fetch_move_delete` procedure that consults
the `target` column of the `imap` table to determine where the message
should go.
Where the message should go is determined after prefetching by the
`imap::target_folder()` procedure. Messages are only downloaded once
they reach their target folder to avoid race conditions in multidevice
setting, such as:
1. One device trying to FETCH the message while the other tries to
MOVE it.
2. One device marking the message as \Seen in the Inbox while the
other has already copied unseen message to the Movebox and is going to
delete the \Seen message in the Inbox.
3. Device downloads the message from the Inbox while there are newer
messages in the Movebox placed there by the other device, thus
processing the messages out of order.
