Generally we could also just remove the device message as we have the
connectivity view, OTOH if you are not using DC a lot, it may be useful
to be notified without opening DC.
And apart from this one bug it's working fine.
Before this PR, when a test failed, we often got:
```
thread panicked while processing panic. aborting.
error: test failed, to rerun pass '-p deltachat --lib'
Caused by:
process didn't exit successfully: `/home/user/deltachat-android/jni/deltachat-core-rust/target/debug/deps/deltachat-33648fc4aaad608c 'contact::tests::test_selfavatar_changed_event' --nocapture` (signal: 4, SIGILL: illegal instruction)
```
instead of the error message and stack trace.
This PR fixes this.
* Add DC_EVENT_SELFAVATAR_CHANGED
* Add test.
Unfortunately I can't easily also test that the avatar is not copied
from unencrypted messages:
In the second encrypted message, the avatar would not be sent again
then, because we only send avatars once a day or so.
* Unfortunately I can't easily also test that the avatar is not copied from unencrypted messages:
In the second encrypted message, the avatar would not be sent again
then, because we only send avatars once a day or so.
The problem was:
When opening the connectivity view while there is no network,
get_connectivity_html() calls schedule_quota_update(), which schedules a
UpdateRecentQuota job. But in update_recent_quota(), connecting fails
and a ConnectivityChanged event is emitted (connectivity changes from
Error to Connecting and back). Therefore the UI calls
get_connectivity_html() again, and the loop is complete.
This made the UI completely unresponsible. To reproduce, just turn wi-fi
off and open the connectivity view.
The fix is:
schedule_quota_update() now only schedules a new job if there is no old
job. To prevent the possible (though probably unlikely) problem that an
old quota update job has a backoff of, like, a day and therefore quota
is not updated, I reduced the backoff time for quota jobs to 10s.
Fixes possibly https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/issues/2043, but we should "re-try" this
Recognizing these emails as forwarded would probably be too complicated and require too much special-casing, but now the user can access the email text via "Show full message".
fix#2599
Co-authored-by: B. Petersen <r10s@b44t.com>
* In dc_maybe_network_lost() directly set the connectivity "Not connected"
r10s reported that without doing this, the connectivity would stay at
"Connected" for 16 more seconds after network is gone and
dc_maybe_network_lost() was called.
* Set the state for all connections
fix#2539
It's always a bit ambiguous which function should do set_err or set last_send_error, I used this rule here:
If some code returns Status::RetryLater, then it sets last_send_error, because Status::RetryLater means that the user won't see the error directly on the message (if we returned Status::Failed(Err(_)), then the message would be shown as failed to the user) Also, smtp_send always sets last_send_error because, well, sending just failed or succeeded.
Also, remove unused field pending_error.
fix https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/2463fix#2116
The email could be private (i.e. only sent to me) or non-private (i.e. also sent to sb else). Also, it could be a classical email or a chat message. Below, I'm describing for each of the four combinations whether they should be assigned to a chat by create_or_lookup_group() or lookup_chat_by_reply(). Because I needed to use these function names a lot, I shortened them to l:group() and l:by_reply() in this PR description.
(!) means todo, (! -> Done) means I fixed something.
## Private classical email:
l:group() and l:by_reply() must both take care not to put it into group
l:group() no (! -> Done), l:by_reply no (! -> Done)
except for classical MUA replies to two-member-groups, they should be put into the parent group
### wrt alias-support:
A private classical email is very probably not going to be an answer to email that went to an alias address:
Suppose Alice writes to support@example.com.
support@example.com forwards to bob@example.com and claire@example.com.
When Bob answers, he will _probably_ answer `To: alice@example.com, support@example.com` (=> it's a non-private classical email).
With this PR, if he does only answer `To: alice@example.com`, (=> it's a private classical email), Alice's DC will show the answer in the private chat with Bob. Which actually makes more sense than showing it in the support@example.com chat I think. Also, if it was shown in the support@example.com chat, then Alice would answer in the support@example.com chat, then Claire would get Alice's message but not Bob's and therefore miss some context.
That being said - **I could change this**. Pretty easily actually, I would just have to remove the call to `is_probably_private_reply()` from `lookup_chat_by_reply()`. Didn't think through all edge cases yet, but should work.
## Private chat message:
l:group() has to put private chat messages into the group: It won't mistakenly put a message there (because it can rely on Chat-Group-Id). Currently, `is_probably_private_reply()` returns true for private chat messages, but l:group still has to put them into the group chat. (it's not nice that the function called is_probably_private_reply returns true for all private chat messages, but I didn't find any nicer solution) l:by_reply() must not assign it to sth special
l:group yes, l:by_reply no
By the way, for chat messages, `try_getting_grpid()` doesn't look at InReplyTo or References, in order not to put private chat-message replies into the group chat.
For alias-support, the same goes as for the private classical emails.
## Non-private classical email:
Just put it into any group, and if there is none, create one.
_Off-topic:
We currently don't look at the recipients lists, which means that a message can easily be assigned to a group although it was not sent to all group members. One day we could somehow compare the recipients list with the members list, but that needs some more discussing (esp. what do we do if they don't match? Create a new group? Show a hint in the UI?) and is nothing for a bug-fixing PR like this one._
l_group yes, l_by_reply yes, even for outgoing messages (! -> Done, this also was the issue reported by @gerryfrancis in the testing group:
Outgoing messages were not put into a chat by In-Reply-To/References, which is correct for chat messages, but for non-private classical outgoing emails, a new ad-hoc group was created everytime.
So, I added this: https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/pull/2465/files#diff-e7606b521f6710ddc6e5236ba5d7eefc917b7ad744b9e71762fd42830c55485bR703-R711)
## Non-private chat message:
Can be put into chat by l:by_reply() because it must be a group message
l:group yes, l:by_reply yes (to make alias support work if the support person uses DC)
Nothing to test or fix here; we have to put chat group messages into the group, which is trivial. And we have to make sure that alias-support works, which already was well tested.
See https://support.delta.chat/t/discussion-how-to-show-error-states/1363/10 <!-- comment -->
It turns out that it's pretty easy to distinguish between lots of states (currently Error/NotConnected, Connecting…, Getting new messages… and Connected). What's not that easy is distinguishing between an actual error and no network, because if the server just doesn't respond, it could mean that we don't have network or that we are trying ipv6, but only ipv4 works.
**WRT debouncing:**
Sending of EVENT_CONNECTIVITY_CHANGED is not debounced, but emitted every time one of the 3 threads (Inbox, Mvbox and Sentbox) has a network error, starts fetching data, or is done fetching data.
This means that it is emitted:
- 9 times when dc_maybe_network() is called or we get network connection
- 12 times when we lose network connection
Some measurements: dc_get_connectivity() takes a little more than 1ms (in my measurements back in March), dc_get_connectivity_html() takes 10-20ms. This means that it's no immmediate problem to call them very often, might increase battery drain though. For the UI it may be a lot of work to update the title everytime; at least Android is smart enough to update the title only once.
Possible problems (we don't have to worry about them now I think):
- Due to the scan_folders feature, if the user has lots of folders, the state could be "Connecting..." for quite a long time, generally DC seemed a little unresponsive to me because it took so long for "Connecting..." to go away. Telegram has a state "Updating..." that sometimes comes after "Connecting...".
To be done in other PRs:
- Better handle the case that the password was changed on the server and authenticating fails, see https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/1923 and https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/1768
- maybe event debouncing (except for "Connected" connectivity events)
fix https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/issues/1760
* Add failing test for #2369
* Completely ignore Drafts folder
fix#2369
* Also ignore messages that have the Draft flag set but are not in the Drafts folder
- Currently, group images are compressed as well because it was easier to implement that way.
- Currently, in the unlikely case that the avatar is compressed down to 20x20 pixels but still bigger than 20KB, the user doesn't get any indication of this, the avatar simply isn't changed (at least on Android).
If we want to change this, the easiest way is probably to let `dc_set_config()` in the ffi call `error!()` if `Selfavatar` can't be set. The same might make sense for some or all other configs. BUUUUUT: At least Android doesn't show error!() toasts anymore, probably because they were used too often and too spammy.
- The factor by which we scale down if the file is too big is 1.5.
* Fix#2335 (delete job flooding)
The problem was:
- You are offline, and an ephemeral message is due to delete.
- load_imap_deletion_job() is called and returns a deletion job for it.
- The job fails because, well, we are offline.
- The job is saved into the database.
- load_imap_deletion_job() is called again, and so on.
* Add test
This PR originally contained a fix for sqlx which turned out not not to be necessary. But on the way, I made some general improvements:
- Under some circumstances, a "normal" test failure led to a timeout, without printing a decent error message. See e.g. https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/8069/workflows/ba2a9949-b4ad-4ceb-a930-073bba05e2db/jobs/30965.
(The problem was: if there is an exception in dc_account_extra_configure(), when trying to handle the exception the line account.log("===================", e, "===================") was called, which can't work as log() only expects one parameter)
- When a test fails: Call `dump_account_info()` even if there is no direct_imap
- In test_import_export_online_all(), add another 100KB file to the backup. This adds resilience against future size changes of the sql db file: The test tests the smoothness of the progress bar. And if there are there are not enough about-equally-sized files, the progress bar can't be smooth.
fix #2073fix#2292 (I think)
- Messages can be assigned to any chat by the References and In-Reply-To, also to 1:1 chats; this has higher priority than the group id because with ad-hoc groups, it can happen that two devices have different group ids for the same conversation thread.
- If `From` is not in the chat (we call this "shadow sender"), `OverrideSenderDisplayname` is set. This communicates to the UI that:
- A `~`should be added in front of the sender's displayname.
- Also in 1:1 chats, the sender's displayname and avatar is shown, as if this was a group.
The "Unknown sender for this chat" messages are completely removed for unprotected groups.
For protected chats, everything stays as it was before.
POSTPONED:
- Maybe (if it turns out to be still necessary):
- The ad-hoc group id is computed by the the References, instead of the member list, as it is currently done
- How do we prevent that the message can't be assigned to the correct chat as the parent message was deleted?
fix#2188
Also, if we notice that the server started reusing old UIDs, _also_ do a `ResyncFolders`, because the server likely forgot to change uid_validity
save subject for messages:
- new api `dc_msg_get_subject()`,
- when quoting, use the subject of the quoted message as the new subject, instead of the
last subject in the chat
fix#2254: if the DB was closed without calling stop_io() and then an interrupt arrives (e.g. incoming message), the db was corrupted.
* Add result.log() for logging with less boilerplate code
* Bugfix: Resultify housekeeping() to make it abort if the db is closed instead of just deleting everything
* Require the UI to call dc_stop_io() before backup export
* Prepare a bit better for closed-db: Resultify get_uidvalidity and get_uid_next and let job::load_next() wait until the db is open
About the bug (before this PR):
if the DB was closed without calling stop_io() and then an interrupt arrives (e.g. incoming message):
- I don't know if it downloads the message, but of course at some point the process of receiving the message will fail
- In my test, DC is just in the process of moving a message when the imex starts, but then can't delete the job or update the msg server_uid
- Then, when job::load_next() is called, no job can be loaded. That's why it calls `load_housekeeping_job()`. As `load_housekeeping_job()` can't load the time of the last housekeeping, it assumes we never ran housekeeping and returns a new Housekeeping job, which is immediately executed.
- housekeeping can't find any blobs referenced in the db and therefore deletes almost all blobs.
Now I know why the tests failed before 48c58a7 (i.e. after c923670) but
not on master (i.e. before c923670):
because of a bug, scan_folders() set the configured_sentbox to None if
it was set before. If it was None before, it restored the correct value.
On master, there was another bug that led to two runs of
scan_folders() being started at the same time. Therefore, the first run
set configured_sentbox to None, the second one restored the correct
value.
c923670 fixed the latter bug, so that only one run of scan_folders() was
started. Therefore, configured_sentbox stayed None incorrectly and
test_fetch_existing() failed.
48c58a7 fixed the former bug.
This commit adds checks to test_fetch_existing(), so that it definitely
checks for the former bug.
This does fix a bug and it makes the tests pass, but I'm not sure why it
makes the tests pass; maybe there is a race condition that made the
tests fail and my commit just leads to another timing.
* Copypaste-merge my old work
* Start implementing mailinglists the new way
* Create pseudo contact
* Fine-tune docs
* Remove some unnecessary changes
* style
* Make a stock str
* Fix a crash. Yes, this line caused a panic when reconfiguring on Android
(without a reasonable error log). Also, I could not receive any messages
anymore.
* rfmt
* Add tests and make them pass
* Even more tests
* rfmt
* Enhance test and fix bug
* Don't update the sender name when prefetching because maybe it's a mailing list
* Use an enum instead of numbers for the decision
* Don't remove anyone from mailing lists
* Fix bug in the regex
* Adjust error msg
* Compile error after rebase
* Correctly emit event
* Add dc_msg_is_mailing_list so that you can find out whether messages in the deaddrop belong to mailing lists.
* Add received headers to unit tests
* Comments, small tweaks
* Use dc_msg_get_override_sender_name instead of dc_msg_get_sender_name
* Add dc_msg_get_sender_first_name() because sometimes the first name was not correctly shown in mailing lists
* small fixes, don't let the user modify mailing list groups
* Hide contacts for addresses like noreply@github.com and reply+AEJ...@reply.github.com
When testing mailing lists, I noticed that sometimes a mailing list
contact got a name (like, hocuri <noreply@github.com>). It turned out
that ages ago, I had accidentally written an email to - in this example
- hocuri <noreply@github.com> and it had been added to the contacts
list.
This hides email addresses from the contacts list that are obviously not
meant to be written at and prevents updating the names.
* Comment, clippy
* Replace u32 with ChatId
* Resolve lost of small issues from the reviews
* remove dc_msg_get_sender_first_name
* add dc_msg_get_real_chat_id()
this allows to check if a contact request belongs to a mailing list
and to show name/avatar/whatever of the mailinglist.
another approach was to duplicate some chat-apis for messages
(eg. dc_msg_is_mailing_list()) however that would require far more new apis.
the idea to change the behavior of dc_msg_get_chat_id() would be
more clean, however, that easily breaks existing implementations
and can led to hard to find bugs.
* remove now unused Message.is_mailing_list()
* if a name for a mailing list is missing, use List-ID
* fix comment
* fix error message
* document how dc_get_chat_contacts() works for mailing lists
* refine decide api (#2185)
* add DC_DECIDE* constants to deltachat.h, tweak documentation
* use StartChat/Block/NotNow instead of Yes/Never/NotNow
* decide_on_contact_request works on ctx/msg-id
functions working on message-objects
usually do not read or write directly on the database.
therefore, decide_on_contact_request()
should not work with message-objects as well,
it is even a bit misleading, as eg. chat-id of the object is not modified.
instead, the function works on context,
similar to dc_send_msg(), dc_create_chat() and so on.
for now, i moved it to context, could maybe be part od MsgId.
* Update src/chatlist.rs
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
* refine documentation
* re-add accidentally deleted Param::MailingList
* remove pseudo-contact in domain @mailing.list
1. the pseudo-contact was added to the mailing list contacts,
which is not needed.
might be that we want to add the recent contacts there in a subsequent pr
(we do not know all contacts of a mailing list)
2. the pseudo-contact was used to block
mailing lists; this is done by setting the chat to Blocked::Manually now
3- the pseudo-contact was used for unblocking;
as it is very neat not to require additional ui for mailing list unblocking,
might be that we introduce a similar pseudo-contact for this limited purpose
in a subsequent pr, however, the pseudo-contact needs to exist only
during unblocking then, maybe also the special domain is not needed,
we'll see :)
* Move dc_decide_on_contact_request() up to the dc_context section as it's a member of dc_context now
More specifically, to the "handle messages" section
* re-introduce Chattype::Mailinglist (#2195)
* re-introduce Chattype::Mailinglist
* exhaustive chattype-check in fetch_existing_msgs() and get_summary2()
* exhaustive chattype-check in ndn_maybe_add_info_msg()
* exhaustive chattype-check in message::fill()
* remove dc_chat_is_mailing_list() from ffi
Co-authored-by: B. Petersen <r10s@b44t.com>
Notable improvements:
- [track_caller](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2091-inline-semantic.md): We can get the location of the caller of a message, which makes logging easier as you can have dedicated functions (not only macros), e.g. write a function `log(self: Result, msg: string) -> Option`
- The output after a panic is shorter and hides lots of uninteresting
function calls
- Test output is better captured
After merging, we should probably wait a bit with using the track_caller
feature to make going back easier, should we get problems again.
Start implementing #1994
TODO (in later PRs):
- Add a hint to the watch settings that all folders are fetched from time to time (to be done in the individual UIs)
- folder names are case-insensitive, so double-check that all comparisons are case-insensitive
- The `scan_folders.rs` file didn't get as large as I expected and it's probably not worth it having an extra file for it. But if there are no objections, I'll make another PR to rename it to `folders.rs` and also put into it `configure_folders()` from `imap/mod.rs` and `needs_move()` with all its tests from `message.rs`.
Done:
- Most mailboxes have a "Drafts" folder where constantly new emails appear but we don't actually want to show them, what do we do about this? The most reliable way to detect such messages that we found up to now is:
If there is no `Received` header AND it's not in the `ConfiguredSentbox`, then ignore the email.
- before or after INBOX idle trigger a new "scan all folders for messages". It does a "list folders" and then goes through all folders with select-statements, checking if "next-uid" was changed since checked last time. This might be batchable but in any case should not consume a lot of traffic. We might debounce this scan activity to happen at most every N minutes
- if next-uid changed for a folder, we "prefetch" and "fetch" DC-messages as as needed ("dc-messages" are not just those with "Chat-Version" headers, but can also be regular emails)
- if we discover DC-messages in folders that have the "/Spam" flag (maybe excluding ContactRequests) we automatically move them to INBOX/DeltaChat folder to help provider-spam-systems to regard this contact/mail as non-spam
- for now, we do not change any user visible option, but introduce this "scan all" automatically and on top of what exists. The DeltaChat folder-watching does not perform scan-all-folders (maybe with the exception to trigger scan-all also with DeltaChat if INBOX is not watched)
- Tests (except if you have ideas to improve them)
- all folders, their last uidvalidity, next-seen etc. are kept in a separate "imap-sync" sqlite table. Maybe this can be used to streamline some of the "Sent" folder and "DeltaChat" folder detection code we already have.
- We now also move self-sent messages from the Inbox to the Sent folder if `mvbox_move` is off, as this was very easy to do now. This way, we now behave more like a normal MUA if the user wants this.
FOR LATER PRs:
- maybe for the first 50 messages or so, we could reduce the IDLE-timeout (currently 23 minutes or so) to faster detect messages sent to non-inbox folders. However, on Android and iOS, we would likely trigger scan-all when the app moves to foreground, and so it might not be neccessary to reduce the current idle-timeout at least for them. We can leave this "faster discovery" question for the end, after we move to real-life testing.
- (Later on, after the above works, we can consider heuristics on which folders to perform IDLE on, and remove the Watch-folder options (inbox, deltachat, sent). We tried to find a safe scheme for already doing it but failed to fine one, too many unknowns, also some questions regarding multi-device (you might have different settings with each of it, one moves, the other doesn't etc.) so we postponed this in favor of the above incremental suggestion.)
* Start implementing #1994
* Add debug logs, it seems like the SQL migration can go into another pr
* Let fetch_new_messages return whether there are new emails
* Code style
* Don't prefetch if there are no new emails
* clippy
* Even more debug logs
* If the folder was not newly selected, return always try to fetch as
uid_next is probably outdated
* Fix new bug
* Recognize spam folder
* if we discover DC-messages in folders that have the "/Spam" flag (excluding ContactRequests) we automatically move them to INBOX/DeltaChat folder to help provider-spam-systems to regard this contact/mail as non-spam
* Clippy, prioritize folder_meaning over folder_name_meaning
* Add a first test, for the first day after installation only debounce to 2s
* Start adding two tests (both of them fail)
* Don't abort folder scan if one folder fails
* More consts
* Replace bool return value by enum
* Split test up into multiple tests
* Print logs during rust tests
* Rust tests pass now
* .
* One of the Python tests passes now - reconfigure folders during scanning
* Make the last test pass - Delete emails in all folders when starting the test, not only inbox and mvbox
The problem had been that emails were left in the folder "xyz"
* lint
* DB migration (untested)
* Store uid_next in SQL instead of lastseen in a config
* Revert "If Inbox-watch is disabled and enabled again, do not fetch emails from in between"
all folders are always watched, anyway
* clippy, rm debug logs, comments
* Codestyle, comments
* fixing things again
* Fix another test: don't fetch from uid_next-1 but uid_next; make some {} to {:#} so that we can use `.context(...)`
* move self-sent, non-setupmessage chat messages to the Sent folder if `mvbox_move` is off
* comment
* Comments, make sure things work even if there is no uid_next
* Style
* Comments
* The rust test tested wrongly
* comments, small codestyle change
* Ignore emails that are probably only drafts
Most mailboxes have a "Drafts" folder where constantly new emails appear
but we don't actually want to show them.
So: If there is no Received header AND it's not in the ConfiguredSentbox,
then ignore the email.
Also: Add test.
* Fix occasional test failure, it was introduced as DC now moves messages from Inbox to Sent
* Add `Received` header to the rust tests
* After this PR we will always watch all folders and delete messages there if server_delete is enabled. So, for people who have server_delete on, disable it and add a hint to the devicechat
* comment, small fix
* link2xt's first review
* Use ON CONFLICT(FOLDER) DO to update and if it doesn't exist, then insert
Reason from link2xt: We had a problem with multiple peerstates inserted due to key fingerprint parsing error previously. With logic in Rust a similar problem can occur: an UPDATE can fail for reasons other than a conflict. PRIMARY KEY should ensure uniqueness in this case, but anyway.
* Remove two TODO statements, remove fetch_new_messages: ignoring uid {}, uid_next was {} log
* Next TODO: Make uidvalidity and uid_next DEFAULT 0
* rm two TODOs, Seems like we are not going to `exclude folders that are watched anyway` in this PR
* small tweak: Handle instants more carefully
* Add scan_all_folders_debounce_secs config for tests, set debounce to 60s (before it was just 2s during the first day)
* Don't use bold letters for the device message
* React to changes in the folders better
Before, if there was a configured Sent folder, but then it got
removed and replaced with another folder with a name meaning "Sent" but
without Sent flag, it would be ignored.
So, instead of checking against ConfiguredSentboxFolder,
create two Option variables at the beginning of the loop and replace
them with Some if it is None. At the end of the loop, store the new
values into ConfiguredSendboxFolder and ConfiguredSpamFolder, even if it
is None.
Also, derive some useful traits.
* move job: Return a meaningful error if server_folder is None instead of panicing
* small error-handling fix
* Fix test_fetch_existing() python test
Before, we sometimes got a race condition where scan_folders() sees that
there is a Sentbox and saves this info after we set the
ConfiguredSentbox to None and before the message is sent.
So, just expect that the message is moved to the sentbox.
* migration is 72 now
* rm 2 TODOs, Don't infinitely retry when dc_receive_imf() returns Err
* clippy: Remove glob imports
* Delete created folders at the beginning of tests
(some created folders made problems in the next tests because)
* Improve resetting accounts between tests
- Make sure delete_expired_messages and housekeeping runs once a day
- delete more info about messages when putting them to trash (esp. also
delete txt_raw, from_id and to_id as we don't need those anymore, so
they are data that was unnecessarily kept)
fix#1926, fix#2090
Also:
* Nicer test_utils: add send_text() and print_chat()
* Adapt ephemeral messages for testing (make them accurate to the second)
* Add test for ephemeral messages
* Make pop_sent_msg() really pop the last sent message
If mvbox_move was on and an mdn was received, it was not marked as read.
Also remove a confusing log that said that we are adding a markseen job, even if we weren't. As job::save() logs itself, there is no need to log this again.
disabled and re-enabled
That's another narrow-stitching patch for a scenario where many emails could
be deleted all at once and surprisingly: user disables inbox-watch, enables delete-from-server, after a moth enables inbox-watch again -> currently all emails that arrived in the meantime will be deleted (if emails are not fetched, they won't be deleted)
fix#2020
When forwarding a message, the original `in_reply_to` stays in place.
I did not find any recent commit that changed anything about this,
but IIRC there was a bug that prevented setting the `in_reply_to` at
all.
So, for chat messages, do not look at the InReplyTo header (and also not
at the References header)
update_device_chats() takes about 2 seconds on a modern device (Android) because the
welcome image file has to be written to the disk as a blob. The problem
was that this was done after the progress bar had vanished and before
anything else happened so that I thought that something had gone wrong
multiple times.
The UIs have to remove update_device_chats(), too..
Read all of an e-mail accounts messages and extract all To/CC addresses
if the From was from our own account.
Then, fetch existing messages from the server and show them.
Also, I fixed two other things:
- just by chance my test failed because of an completely unrelated bug.
The bug: bcc_self messages were not marked as read if mvbox_move was set
to true.
- add some color to the test output (minor change)
Hocuri
