<https://github.com/swatinem/rust-cache>
caches only dependencies, and
dependencies don't change most of the time,
so PRs store the same cache
as already stored
by the main branch commit PRs are based on.
Hash of Cargo.{toml,lock} is part of the
cache key, so for dependency updating PRs
the cache key is new. Such PRs
rebuild everything from scratch,
which is a separate problem.
Storing such cache from PR is however
not useful because most of the time
dependency updating PR is going
to be rebased again before merging
as Dependabot PRs are opened in a batch
and then merged one by one
while Dependabot rebases remaining PRs.
Use add_or_update_transport() instead of deprecated configure(),
do not use deprecated get_next_messages(),
make use of AttrDict,
print invite link,
do not use % formatting for logging.
Currently, the Fingerprint type implements Display, but this doesn't get
you the canonical fingerprint representation, but something
human-readable. This is confusing, and back when I first used
`Fingerprint`, I immediately wrote a bug because of this. So, instead,
make a function `human_readable()` on Fingerprint.
This comes from the discussion at
https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/8174#discussion_r3143130722.
Implementing `FromStr` and then calling `parse()` creates an
indirection, which is hard to follow for people who are not familiar
with Rust. @r10s recently voiced this problem when we were
pair-programming, and I agree.
We can decide what exactly to call the new function.
I didn't remove all `FromStr` implementations yet; `FromStr for
Fingerprint`, `FromStr for Params`, `FromStr for MozConfigTag` and
`FromStr for EphemeralTimer` are still left.
E.g. rename location::is_sending_locations_to_chat to location::is_sending_to_chat.
Then import only the location module and use it with location:: prefix,
similarly to how e.g. std::fs or std::tokio::fs avoids using "fs" or "file"
in function names.
There's no check for `from_id` so another group member can delete the
message, but this can only happen in case of message reordering and the
problem already exists for usual messages, so we may ignore it and
overall a group represents a scope of trust.
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Remove unused info_only option from `get_chat_msgs_ex()`.
This option was meant to show an "audit log" of a group, i.e. only the
info messages. This feature was removed again from Desktop, but the
option still lingered around in Core.
This also adds a doc comment to the JsonRPC functions, because I
wanted to note somewhere that the parameter is deprecated, and I needed
some place to put this note.
Looking forward, it is unclear how exactly we want to handle errors, but
in the meantime, this is a simple thing we can do to improve the
situation.
If you have a broadcast channel, chances are that some of your
recipients have some problems receiving your messages. You are probably
not too interested in that.
In reality, some channel operators were quite confused by these errors,
and we told them to just ignore them, but at this point we may as well
just hide them.
Theoretically we can start removing recipients that never get our
messages at some point.
This causes problems for Delta Chat Desktop at
<https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-desktop/pull/6278>
even though the logic was originally introduced for iOS.
If the problem remains on iOS,
heuristics can be added into iOS UI.
We shouldn't just revert ad7f873c68 because then we won't be able to
normally transfer a backup from a device having clock a bit in the future.
INDEXED BY msgs_index7 is to prevent SQLite from downgrading to using msgs_index2 which has less
ordering.
