While testing the previous commit i understood that it's better to try giving different colors to
groups, particularly if their names are equal so that they visually differ, and at the same time
preserve the color if the group is renamed. Using `grpid` solves this. So let groups change colors
once and forever.
We can't just fail on an invalid chat name because the user would lose the work already done in the
UI like selecting members. Sometimes happens to me when i put space into name.
Follow-up to https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/7125: We now have a
mix of non-async (parking_lot) and async (tokio) Mutexes used for the
connectivity. We can just use non-async Mutexes, because we don't
attempt to hold them over an await point. I also tested that we get a
compiler error if we do try to hold one over an await point (rather than
just deadlocking/blocking the executor on runtime).
Not 100% sure about using the parking_lot rather than std Mutex, because
since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93740, parking_lot
doesn't have a lot of advantages anymore. But as long as iroh depends on
it, we might as well use it ourselves.
`get_connectivity()` is expected to return immediately, not when the scheduler finishes updating its
state in `start_io()/stop_io()/pause_io()`, otherwise it causes app non-responsiveness.
Instead of read-locking `SchedulerState::inner`, store the `ConnectivityStore` collection in
`Context` and fetch it from there in `get_connectivity()`. Update it every time we release a write
lock on `SchedulerState::inner`.
If the contact is already introduced by someone,
usually by adding to a verified group,
it should not be reverified because of another
chat message is a verified group.
This usually results is verification loops
and is not meaningful because the verifier
likely got this same contact introduced
in the same group.
We haven't dropped verified groups yet, so we need to do smth with messages that can't be verified
yet which often occurs because of messages reordering, particularly in large groups. Apart from the
reported case #7059, i had other direct reports that sometimes messages can't be verified for
various reasons, but when the reason is already fixed, it should be possible to re-download failed
messages and see them.
Also remove the code replacing the message text with a verification error from
`apply_group_changes()` as `add_parts()` already does this.
This doesn't fix anything in UIs currently because they don't call `get_securejoin_qr()` for
unencrypted groups, but it's still better to log an error which will be shown in this case.
In order to debug some test failures wrt broadcast channels, I need to
read the log of some tests that have an alice0 and an alice1.
It's currently not possible to tell whether a line was logged by alice0
or alice1, so, I would like to change that with this PR.
Edit: Turns out that there are more tests that call their profiles
"alice1"/"alice2" (or "alice"/"alice2") than "alice0"/"alice1". So, I
changed the logging to count "alice", "alice2", "alice3", ….
Not sure whether I should adapt old tests; it might save someone some
confusion in the future, but I might also make a mistake and make it so
that the test doesn't properly test anymore.
Chat was only loaded to avoid removing GuaranteeE2ee
for protected chats, but resending a message
in protected chat is guaranteed to be encrypted anyway.
Otherwise if the message is loaded by the UI
after GuaranteeE2ee is reset but before SMTP queue item
is created, the message may appear as unencrypted
even if it was actually resent as encrypted.
Encrypted message may create unencrypted groups
if the message does not have a Chat-Group-ID.
This can happen if v1 client sends an encrypted
message to opportunistically encrypted ad hoc group.
In this case `from_id` corresponds to the key-contact,
but we should add address-contact of the sender
to the member list.
The icon is mainly used to identify unencrypted chats
in the chatlist where encrypted and unencrypted chats are mixed.
It is used for group chats rather than only for 1:1 chats
with address-contacts.
We don't want to prefer returning verified contacts because e.g. if a bot was reinstalled and its
key changed, it may not be verified, and we don't want to bring the user to the old chat if they
click on the bot email address. But trying to return accepted contacts increases security and
doesn't break the described scenario.
If an address-contact and a key-contact were seen at exactly the same time, that doesn't necessarily
mean that it's a random event, it might occur because some code updates contacts this way in some
scenario. While this is unlikely, prefer to look up the key-contact.
Work around possible checkpoint starvations (there were cases reported when a WAL file is bigger
than 200M) and also make sure we truncate the WAL periodically. Auto-checkponting does not normally
truncate the WAL (unless the `journal_size_limit` pragma is set), see
https://www.sqlite.org/wal.html.
- It's obvious that addresses are needed to add contacts, so `_by_address_list` looks excessive.
- The function only looks up `SELF` by address.
- The name was confusing because there's also `lookup_key_contacts_by_address_list()` that actually
looks up key contacts by addresses (not only `SELF`).
The info will look like:
```
debug_assertions=On - DO NOT RELEASE THIS BUILD
```
or:
```
debug_assertions=Off
```
I tested that this actually works when compiling on Android.
<details><summary>This is how it looked before the second
commit</summary>
<p>
The deltachat_core_version line in the info will look like:
```
deltachat_core_version=v2.5.0 [debug build]
```
or:
```
deltachat_core_version=v2.5.0 [release build]
```
I tested that this actually works when compiling on Android.
</p>
</details>
This adds a test for https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/7032/.
The crash happened if you received a message that has the from contact
also in the "To: " and "Chat-Group-Member-Fpr: " headers. Not sure how
it happened that such a message was created; I managed to create one in
a test, but needed to access some internals of MimeFactory for that.
I then saved the email that is sent by Alice into the test-data
directory, and then made a test that Bob doesn't crash if he receives
this email. And as a sanity-check, also test that Bob marks Fiona as
verified after receiving this email.
Sort recipients by `add_timestamp DESC` so that if the group is large and there are multiple SMTP
messages, a newly added member receives the member addition message earlier and has gossiped keys of
other members (otherwise the new member may receive messages from other members earlier and fail to
verify them).
This PR adds a test to reproduce a bug raised by @adbenitez that peer
channels break when the resend feature is used.
---------
Co-authored-by: iequidoo <dgreshilov@gmail.com>
This should fix https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/7030; @r10s if
you could test whether it fixes your problem
The crash happened if you received a message that has the from contact
also in the "To: " and "Chat-Group-Member-Fpr: " headers. Not sure how
it happened that such a message was created.
Previously, chat protection was only removed if the chat became an
email-chat because the key-contact has a different email, but not if the
chat became an email-chat for a different reason.
Therefore, it could happen that the migration produced a protected,
unencrypted chat, where you couldn't write any messages.
I tested that applying this fix actually fixes the bug I had.
