this PR adds a info message "messages are end-to-end-encrypted" also for
chats created by eg. vcards. by the removal of lock icons, this is a
good place to hint for that in addition; this is also what eg. whatsapp
and others are doing
the wording itself is tweaked at
https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/pull/3817 (and there is
also the rough idea to make the message a little more outstanding, by
some more dedicated colors)
~~did not test in practise, if this leads to double "e2ee info messages"
on secure join, tests look good, however.~~ EDIT: did lots of practise
tests meanwhile :)
most of the changes in this PR are about test ...
ftr, in another PR, after 2.0 reeases, there could probably quite some
code cleanup wrt set-protection, protection-disabled etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Part of #6884
----
- [x] Add new chat type `InBroadcastChannel` and `OutBroadcastChannel`
for incoming / outgoing channels, where the former is similar to a
`Mailinglist` and the latter is similar to a `Broadcast` (which is
removed)
- Consideration for naming: `InChannel`/`OutChannel` (without
"broadcast") would be shorter, but less greppable because we already
have a lot of occurences of `channel` in the code. Consistently calling
them `BcChannel`/`bc_channel` in the code would be both short and
greppable, but a bit arcane when reading it at first. Opinions are
welcome; if I hear none, I'll keep with `BroadcastChannel`.
- [x] api: Add create_broadcast_channel(), deprecate
create_broadcast_list() (or `create_channel()` / `create_bc_channel()`
if we decide to switch)
- Adjust code comments to match the new behavior.
- [x] Ask Desktop developers what they use `is_broadcast` field for, and
whether it should be true for both outgoing & incoming channels (or look
it up myself)
- I added `is_out_broadcast_channel`, and deprecated `is_broadcast`, for
now
- [x] When the user changes the broadcast channel name, immediately show
this change on receiving devices
- [x] Allow to change brodacast channel avatar, and immediately apply it
on the receiving device
- [x] Make it possible to block InBroadcastChannel
- [x] Make it possible to set the avatar of an OutgoingChannel, and
apply it on the receiving side
- [x] DECIDE whether we still want to use the broadcast icon as the
default icon or whether we want to use the letter-in-a-circle
- We decided to use the letter-in-a-circle for now, because it's easier
to implement, and I need to stay in the time plan
- [x] chat.rs: Return an error if the user tries to modify a
`InBroadcastChannel`
- [x] Add automated regression tests
- [x] Grep for `broadcast` and see whether there is any other work I
need to do
- [x] Bug: Don't show `~` in front of the sender's same in broadcast
lists
----
Note that I removed the following guard:
```rust
if !new_chat_contacts.contains(&ContactId::SELF) {
warn!(
context,
"Received group avatar update for group chat {} we are not a member of.", chat.id
);
} else if !new_chat_contacts.contains(&from_id) {
warn!(
context,
"Contact {from_id} attempts to modify group chat {} avatar without being a member.",
chat.id,
);
} else [...]
```
i.e. with this change, non-members will be able to modify the avatar.
Things were slightly easier this way, and I think that this is in line
with non-members being able to modify the group name and memberlist
(they need to know the Group-Chat-Id, anyway), but I can also change it
back.
This change introduces a new type of contacts
identified by their public key fingerprint
rather than an e-mail address.
Encrypted chats now stay encrypted
and unencrypted chats stay unencrypted.
For example, 1:1 chats with key-contacts
are encrypted and 1:1 chats with address-contacts
are unencrypted.
Groups that have a group ID are encrypted
and can only contain key-contacts
while groups that don't have a group ID ("adhoc groups")
are unencrypted and can only contain address-contacts.
JSON-RPC API `reset_contact_encryption` is removed.
Python API `Contact.reset_encryption` is removed.
"Group tracking plugin" in legacy Python API was removed because it
relied on parsing email addresses from system messages with regexps.
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: iequidoo <dgreshilov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: B. Petersen <r10s@b44t.com>
Move all `configured_*` parameters into a new SQL table `transports`.
All `configured_*` parameters are deprecated; the only exception is
`configured_addr`, which is used to store the address of the primary
transport. Currently, there can only ever be one primary transport (i.e.
the `transports` table only ever has one row); this PR is not supposed
to change DC's behavior in any meaningful way.
This is a preparation for mt.
---------
Co-authored-by: l <link2xt@testrun.org>
`self.accounts.read().await.get_all()` acquires a read lock
and does not release it until the end of `for` loop.
After that, a writer may get into the queue,
e.g. because of the concurrent `add_account` call.
In this case `let context_option = self.accounts.read().await.get_account(id);`
tries to acquire another read lock and deadlocks
because tokio RwLock is write-preferring and will not
give another read lock while there is a writer in the queue.
At the same time, writer never gets a write lock
because the first read lock is not released.
The fix is to get a single read lock
for the whole `get_all_accounts()` call.
This is described in <https://docs.rs/tokio/1.44.1/tokio/sync/struct.RwLock.html#method.read>:
"Note that under the priority policy of RwLock, read locks are not
granted until prior write locks, to prevent starvation. Therefore
deadlock may occur if a read lock is held by the current task, a write
lock attempt is made, and then a subsequent read lock attempt is made by
the current task."
Found and fixed a bug while investigating
https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/6656. It's not the same bug,
though.
Steps to reproduce this bug:
- Create a new profile
- Transfer it to a second device
- Send a message from the first device
- -> It will never arrive on the second device, instead a warning will
be printed that you are using DC on multiple devices.
The bug was that the key wasn't created before the backup transfer, so
that the second device then created its own key instead of using the
same key as the first device.
In order to regression-test, this PR now changes `clone()` to use "Add
second device" instead of exporting and importing a backup. Exporting
and importing a backup has enough tests already.
This PR also adds an unrelated test `test_selfavatar_sync()`.
The bug was introduced by https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/6574 in
v1.156.0
Instead of being trashed, the message containing a reaction remains in the chat, hidden and InFresh. When the chat is opened, it will be marked as Seen on the server, so that a second device removes the notifications for the reaction.
Close https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/6210.
Also, this adds a benchmark.
This change introduces new config options
`proxy_enabled` and `proxy_url`
that replace `socks5_*`.
Tested with deltachat-repl
by starting it with
`cargo run --locked -p deltachat-repl -- deltachat-db` and running
```
> set proxy_enabled 1
> set proxy_url ss://...
> setqr dcaccount:https://chatmail.example.org/new
> configure
```
configured_imap_certificate_checks=0 means
accept invalid certificates unless provider database
says otherwise or SOCKS5 is enabled.
It should not be saved into the database anymore.
This bug was introduced in
<https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/pull/5854>
(commit 6b4532a08e)
and affects released core 1.142.4, 1.142.5 and 1.142.6.
Fix reverts faulty fix from
<https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/pull/5886>
(commit a268946f8d)
which changed the way configured_imap_certificate_checks=0
is interpreted and introduced problems
for existing setups with configured_imap_certificate_checks=0:
<https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/5889>.
Existing test from previous fix is not reverted
and still applies.
Regression test is added to check that
configured_imap_certificate_checks
is not "0" for new accounts.
If user has not set any settings manually
and provider is not configured,
default to strict TLS checks.
Bug was introduced in
<https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/pull/5854>
(commit 6b4532a08e)
and affects released core 1.142.4 and 1.142.5.
The problem only affects accounts configured
using these core versions with provider
not in the provider database or when using advanced settings.
`Context::send_sync_msg()` mustn't be called from multiple tasks in parallel to avoid sending the
same sync items twice because sync items are removed from the db only after successful
sending. Let's guarantee this by calling `send_sync_msg()` only from the SMTP loop. Before
`send_sync_msg()` could be called in parallel from the SMTP loop and another task doing
e.g. `chat::sync()` which led to `test_multidevice_sync_chat` being flaky because of events
triggered by duplicated sync messages.
This is broken since 44227d7b86
mimeparser only recognizes read receipts
by the Content-Type being "multipart/report".
If multipart/report is hidden inside multipart/mixed
and the message is not encrypted,
it degrades encryption.
