the user-given contact name may be set to an empty string;
in this case the authname or the email is used for the contact
and also for the name of possibly existing chats.
this works well for `dc_chat_get_name()` as that just uses
`dc_contact_get_display_name()` for single-chats.
it did not work for `dc_get_chatlist(query)` as that
uses the database for performance reasons -
however, in the database, the empty string is written
instead of the display name is written for a chat.
this is fixed by this pr by also using
dc_contact_get_display_name() when updating the chats-table
(similar to `dc_create_chat_by_contact_id()`)
message type directly (ex. `const.DC_MSG_STICKER`) so if new message types are
added, they can be used direcly without needing the python API to be updated.
This is an PGP/MIME format produced by Microsoft Exchange and ProtonMail IMAP/SMTP Bridge,
described in detail in https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dkg-openpgp-pgpmime-message-mangling-00.html
This patch adds seamless support for "Mixed Up" Encryption, repairing
mangled Autocrypt messages without notifying the user.
&str queries are not persistent by default. To make queries persistent,
they have to be constructed with sqlx::query.
Upstream sqlx does not contain the change that make all queries
persistent, but it is not needed anymore. but
fix #2073fix#2292 (I think)
- Messages can be assigned to any chat by the References and In-Reply-To, also to 1:1 chats; this has higher priority than the group id because with ad-hoc groups, it can happen that two devices have different group ids for the same conversation thread.
- If `From` is not in the chat (we call this "shadow sender"), `OverrideSenderDisplayname` is set. This communicates to the UI that:
- A `~`should be added in front of the sender's displayname.
- Also in 1:1 chats, the sender's displayname and avatar is shown, as if this was a group.
The "Unknown sender for this chat" messages are completely removed for unprotected groups.
For protected chats, everything stays as it was before.
POSTPONED:
- Maybe (if it turns out to be still necessary):
- The ad-hoc group id is computed by the the References, instead of the member list, as it is currently done
- How do we prevent that the message can't be assigned to the correct chat as the parent message was deleted?
