Correctly handle messages with old timestamps for verified chats:
* They must not be sorted over a protection-changed info message
* If they change the protection, then they must not be sorted over existing other messages, because then the protection-changed info message would also be above these existing messages.
This PR fixes this:
1. Even seen messages can't be sorted into already-noticed messages anymore. **This also changes DC's behavior in the absence of verified 1:1 chats**. Before this PR, messages that are marked as seen when they are downloaded will always be sorted by their timestamp, even if it's very old.
2. protection-changed info messages are always sorted to the bottom.
**Edit:**
3. There is an exception to rule 1: Outgoing messages are still allowed to be sorted purely by their timestamp, and don't influence old messages. This is to the problem described at [*].
Together, these rules also make sure that the protection-changed info message is always right above the message causing the change.
[*] If we receive messages from two different folders, e.g. `Sent` and `Inbox`, then this will lead to wrong message ordering in many cases. I need to think about this more, or maybe someone else has an idea. One new idea that came to my mind is:
* Always sort noticed messages under the newest info message (this PR sorts them under the newest noticed message, master sorts them purely by their sent timestamp)
* Always sort unnoticed messages under the newest noticed message (that's the same behavior as in this PR and on master)
* Always sort protection-changed info messages to the bottom (as in this PR)
However, after a talk with @link2xt we instead decided to add rule 3. (see above) because it seemed a little bit easier.
The test checks that if webxdc update is too large to
download with the current `download_limit`,
it is applied afterwards when the user manually downloads the update message.
tokio-tar 0.3.0 prints message "create_dir_all ..." to stdout during import.
tokio-tar 0.3.1 has removed this debug output which broke stdio JSON-RPC protocol.
If the verification is broken, `can_send()` is false.
But if the user was typing a message right when a verification-breaking message came in, the UI still needs to be able to save it as a draft.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Set a draft
- Your chat partner breaks verification
- Go back to the chats list
- Go to the chat again
- Accept the breakage
- Expected: The draft is still there
- Bug behavior: The draft is gone
Some Dovecot servers are configured
to alias "INBOX.DeltaChat" and "DeltaChat" to the same folder.
In this case Delta Chat moves new emails from "INBOX"
to "DeltaChat", but then discovers the same mail in "INBOX.DeltaChat"
and tries to move it to "DeltaChat" again.
Each time a MOVE command is issued to move the message
from "INBOX.DeltaChat" to "DeltaChat", the message gets a new UID.
To prevent such IMAP move loop between aliased folders,
we do not move the message if we have already seen it on IMAP,
i.e. we have its Message-ID in the `imap` table.
Note that we do not use `rfc724_mid_exists`,
because it checks the `msgs` table and would consider
BCC-self messages seen even before we see them in the Inbox,
preventing their move to the DeltaChat folder.
Duplicate messages and messages without Message-IDs
are not moved anymore, but this is better
than having an infinite move loop.
