Change `BccSelf` default to 0 for chatmail configurations and enable it upon a backup export. As for
`DeleteServerAfter` who was set to 0 upon a backup export before, make its default dependent on
`BccSelf` for chatmail. We don't need `BccSelf` for chatmail by default because we assume
single-device use. Also `BccSelf` is needed for "classic" email accounts even if `DeleteServerAfter`
is set to "immediately" to detect that a message was sent if SMTP server is slow to respond and
connection is lost before receiving the status line which isn't a problem for chatmail servers.
Even if UIs don't call `Message::force_sticker()`, they don't want conversions of `Sticker` to
`Image` if it's obviously not an image, particularly, has non-image extension. Also UIs don't want
conversions of `Sticker` to anything other than `Image`, so let's keep the `Sticker` viewtype in
this case.
In multi-device case `vg-request-with-auth` left on IMAP may result in situation when Bob joins the
group, then leaves it, then second Alice device comes online and processes `vg-request-with-auth`
again and adds Bob back. So we should IMAP-delete `vg-request-with-auth`. Another device will know
the Bob's key from Autocrypt-Gossip. It's not a problem if Alice loses state (restores from an old
backup) or goes offline for long before sending `vg-member-added`, anyway it may not be delivered by
the server, rather Bob should retry sending SecureJoin messages as he is a part which wants to join,
so let's not solve this for now.
Add a `create` param to `select_with_uidvalidity()` instead of always trying to create the folder
and return `Ok(false)` from it if the folder doesn't exist and shouldn't be created, and handle this
in `store_seen_flags_on_imap()` by just removing "jobs" from the `imap_markseen` table. Also don't
create the folder in other code paths where it's not necessary.
This is to avoid revalidating HTTP cache too frequently (and have many parallel revalidation tasks)
if revalidation fails or the HTTP request takes some time. The stale period >= 1 hour, so 1 more
minute won't be a problem.
It was called from `receive_imf` when an outgoing message is received. But
`Imap::fetch_new_messages()` already calls `chat::mark_old_messages_as_noticed()` which does the job
better (per-message).
SQL statements fail if the number of variables
exceeds `SQLITE_LIMIT_VARIABLE_NUMBER`.
Remaining repeat_vars() calls are difficult to replace
and use arrays passed from the UI,
e.g. forwarded message IDs or marked as seen IDs.
UIs may want to display smth like "Transferring..." after "Establishing connection between
devices..." on nonzero progress. Before, progress on the receiver side was starting with 2 after
receiving enough data.
It only contained proxy
that some users ran in Termux
to look at IMAP traffic.
The same can be achieved with `socat`, e.g.:
socat -v TCP-LISTEN:9999,bind=127.0.0.1 OPENSSL:nine.testrun.org:993
This fixes the HTML display of messages containing forwarded messages. Before, forwarded messages
weren't rendered in HTML and if a forwarded message is long and therefore truncated in the chat, it
could only be seen in the "Message Info". In #4462 it was suggested to display "Show Full
Message..." for each truncated message part and save to `msgs.mime_headers` only the corresponding
part, but this is a quite huge change and refactoring and also it may be good that currently we save
the full message structure to `msgs.mime_headers`, so i'd suggest not to change this for now.
Otherwise the "Show Full Message..." button appears somewhere in the middle of the multipart
message, e.g. after a text in the first message bubble, but before a text in the second
bubble. Moreover, if the second/n-th bubble's text is shortened (ends with "[...]"), the user should
scroll up to click on "Show Full Message..." which doesn't look reasonable. Scrolling down looks
more acceptable (e.g. if the first bubble's text is shortened in a multipart message).
I'd even suggest to show somehow that message bubbles belong to the same multipart message, e.g. add
"[↵]" to the text of all bubbles except the last one, but let's discuss this first.
without the prefix,
it looks as if it is part of the Message-ID,
esp. if Message-ID is longer,
a break on different delimiters may look exactly the same.
see #6329 for some screenshots that initially confused me :)
A user reported to me that after they left a group, they were implicitly readded, but there's no any
readdition message, so currently it looks in the chat like leaving it has no effect, just new
messages continue to arrive. The readdition probably happened because some member didn't receive the
user's self-removal message, anyway, at least there must be a message that the user is readded, even
if it isn't known by whom.
