instead of applying all config_defaults unconditionally
after the first configure, a config_defaults for a given key
is now applied when this key has never been set before.
this way, you can set some keys before calling configure()
and also, later versions can add new defaults for new keys
(that would require another call to configure() then, however)
for "fresh" messages, calc_sort_timestamp() makes sure,
the sorting timestamp is not less than the last-non-fresh message.
this commit fixes the "fresh" state we give to calc_sort_timestamp(),
it just uses the message-state we've already calculated.
the old assumption, that unseen messages are always fresh
is wrong as this "seen" flag just comes from an imap-flag
that is not set for self-sent messages.
therefore, in a multi-device-setup, things are totally messed up.
(the bug was probably in there since a long time,
however did not came to light until the async-move)
This tidies up our testing tools a little bit. We had several
functions which through various changes ended up doing the same and
some more which did very similar stuff, so I merged them to have
things simpler. Also moved towards methods on the TestContext struct
while cleaning this up anyway, seems like this structure is going to
stay around for a bit anyway.
The intersting change is in `test_utils.rs`, everything else is just
updating callers. A few tests used example.org which I moved to
example.com to be able to re-use more configuration of the test
context.
the last message shown in a chatlist
is the one with the largets timestamp that is not hidden.
in the past, we calcualted the last timestamp using a subquery
and uses that timestamp to finally get the message.
this may fail when there are two messages with the same max. timestamp.
with this fix, we return the id from the subquery and use that
(the subquery already filters by hidden etc.)
in practise, by time-smearing,
usually delta-chat avoids messages from the same device
having the same timestamp - however, this may not be true for multi-device
and/or read-receipts.
i have not seen this error all the years, however, it happens with
the async move several times - maybe because things are just sent faster
and things become more probabe.
