ephemeral: add failing rollback protection test

This commit is contained in:
link2xt
2021-09-19 03:36:20 +00:00
parent 4e8724694a
commit b07e20b955

View File

@@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ mod tests {
use super::*;
use crate::config::Config;
use crate::dc_receive_imf::dc_receive_imf;
use crate::download::DownloadState;
use crate::test_utils::TestContext;
use crate::{
@@ -838,4 +839,95 @@ mod tests {
Ok(())
}
// Regression test for a bug in the timer rollback protection.
#[async_std::test]
async fn test_ephemeral_timer_references() -> Result<()> {
let alice = TestContext::new_alice().await;
// Message with Message-ID <first@example.com> and no timer is received.
dc_receive_imf(
&alice,
b"From: Bob <bob@example.com>\n\
To: Alice <alice@example.com>\n\
Chat-Version: 1.0\n\
Subject: Subject\n\
Message-ID: <first@example.com>\n\
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:10:00 +0000\n\
\n\
hello\n",
"INBOX",
1,
false,
)
.await?;
let msg = alice.get_last_msg().await;
let chat_id = msg.chat_id;
assert_eq!(chat_id.get_ephemeral_timer(&alice).await?, Timer::Disabled);
// Message with Message-ID <second@example.com> is received.
dc_receive_imf(
&alice,
b"From: Bob <bob@example.com>\n\
To: Alice <alice@example.com>\n\
Chat-Version: 1.0\n\
Subject: Subject\n\
Message-ID: <second@example.com>\n\
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:11:00 +0000\n\
Ephemeral-Timer: 60\n\
\n\
second message\n",
"INBOX",
2,
false,
)
.await?;
assert_eq!(
chat_id.get_ephemeral_timer(&alice).await?,
Timer::Enabled { duration: 60 }
);
let msg = alice.get_last_msg().await;
// Message is deleted from the database when its timer expires.
msg.id.delete_from_db(&alice).await?;
// Message with Message-ID <third@example.com>, referencing <first@example.com> and
// <second@example.com>, is received. The message <second@example.come> is not in the
// database anymore, so the timer should be applied unconditionally without rollback
// protection.
//
// Previously Delta Chat fallen back to using <first@example.com> in this case and
// compared received timer value to the timer value of the <first@examle.com>. Because
// their timer values are the same ("disabled"), Delta Chat assumed that the timer was not
// changed explicitly and the change should be ignored.
//
// The message also contains a quote of the first message to test that only References:
// header and not In-Reply-To: is consulted by the rollback protection.
dc_receive_imf(
&alice,
b"From: Bob <bob@example.com>\n\
To: Alice <alice@example.com>\n\
Chat-Version: 1.0\n\
Subject: Subject\n\
Message-ID: <third@example.com>\n\
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 00:12:00 +0000\n\
References: <first@example.com> <second@example.com>\n\
In-Reply-To: <first@example.com>\n\
\n\
> hello\n",
"INBOX",
3,
false,
)
.await?;
let msg = alice.get_last_msg().await;
assert_eq!(
msg.chat_id.get_ephemeral_timer(&alice).await?,
Timer::Disabled
);
Ok(())
}
}