deltachat-ffi: document thread safety guarantees

This commit is contained in:
link2xt
2023-03-26 17:22:31 +00:00
parent 070d832580
commit 1d42907114

View File

@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ typedef struct _dc_event_emitter dc_accounts_event_emitter_t;
*
* The example above uses "pthreads",
* however, you can also use anything else for thread handling.
* All deltachat-core functions, unless stated otherwise, are thread-safe.
*
* Now you can **configure the context:**
*
@@ -142,6 +141,67 @@ typedef struct _dc_event_emitter dc_accounts_event_emitter_t;
* ~~~
*
*
* ## Thread safety
*
* All deltachat-core functions, unless stated otherwise, are thread-safe.
* In particular, it is safe to pass the same dc_context_t pointer
* to multiple functions running concurrently in different threads.
*
* All the functions are guaranteed not to use the reference passed to them
* after returning. If the function spawns a long-running process,
* such as dc_configure() or dc_imex(), it will ensure that the objects
* passed to them are not deallocated as long as they are needed.
* For example, it is safe to call dc_imex(context, ...) and
* call dc_context_unref(context) immediately after return from dc_imex().
* It is however **not safe** to call dc_context_unref(context) concurrently
* until dc_imex() returns, because dc_imex() may have not increased
* the reference count of dc_context_t yet.
*
* This means that the context may be still in use after
* dc_context_unref() call.
* For example, it is possible to start the import/export process,
* call dc_context_unref(context) immediately after
* and observe #DC_EVENT_IMEX_PROGRESS events via the event emitter.
* Once dc_get_next_event() returns NULL,
* it is safe to terminate the application.
*
* It is recommended to create dc_context_t in the main thread
* and only call dc_context_unref() once other threads that may use it,
* such as the event loop thread, are terminated.
* Common mistake is to use dc_context_unref() as a way
* to cause dc_get_next_event() return NULL and terminate event loop this way.
* If event loop thread is inside a function taking dc_context_t
* as an argument at the moment dc_context_unref() is called on the main thread,
* the behavior is undefined.
*
* Recommended way to safely terminate event loop
* and shutdown the application is
* to use a boolean variable
* indicating that the event loop should stop
* and check it in the event loop thread
* every time before calling dc_get_next_event().
* To terminate the event loop, main thread should:
* 1. Notify event loop that it should terminate by atomically setting the
* boolean flag in the memory shared between the main thread and event loop.
* 2. Call dc_stop_io() or dc_accounts_stop_io(), depending
* on whether a single account or account manager is used.
* Stopping I/O is guaranteed to emit at least one event
* and interrupt the event loop even if it was blocked on dc_get_next_event().
* 3. Wait until the event loop thread notices the flag,
* exits the event loop and terminates.
* 4. Call dc_context_unref() or dc_accounts_unref().
* 5. Keep calling dc_get_next_event() in a loop until it returns NULL,
* indicating that the contexts are deallocated.
* 6. Terminate the application.
*
* When using C API via FFI in runtimes that use automatic memory management,
* such as CPython, JVM or Node.js, take care to ensure the correct
* shutdown order and avoid calling dc_context_unref() or dc_accounts_unref()
* on the objects still in use in other threads,
* e.g. by keeping a reference to the wrapper object.
* The details depend on the runtime being used.
*
*
* ## Class reference
*
* For a class reference, see the "Classes" link atop.