The TLSF ROM patch code (rom_patch_tlsf.c, rom_patch_multi_heap.c),
their headers, and the per-target *.rom.heap.ld linker scripts are
semantically owned by the heap component, not esp_rom. Move them
accordingly:
- components/esp_rom/patches/esp_rom_tlsf.c
→ components/heap/rom_patches/rom_patch_tlsf.c
- components/esp_rom/patches/esp_rom_multi_heap.c
→ components/heap/rom_patches/rom_patch_multi_heap.c
- components/esp_rom/include/esp_rom_tlsf.h
→ components/heap/rom_patches/include/rom_patch_tlsf.h
- components/esp_rom/include/esp_rom_multi_heap.h
→ components/heap/rom_patches/include/rom_patch_multi_heap.h
- components/esp_rom/<target>/ld/<target>.rom.heap.ld (×8)
→ components/heap/port/<target>/ld/<target>.rom.heap.ld
Update heap/CMakeLists.txt to:
- use target_linker_script() directly for *.rom.heap.ld
- guard post-registration ROM patch setup with NOT BOOTLOADER_BUILD
- drop stale CONFIG_HEAP_TLSF_CHECK_PATCH symbol reference
- drop esp_rom_include_multi_heap_patch from TLSF_CHECK_PATCH guard
Remove the corresponding entries from esp_rom/CMakeLists.txt.
Fixed compilation error when building with -Wwrite-strings or
-Wdiscarded-qualifiers by adding const qualifier to char pointers with
string literals.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/18120
Split the idf_performance.h and target ver, which hold the performance
thresholds, into the headers of each testing.
In the past pytest also parse the common header to get the thresholds.
Now the logic is also removed. Performance thresholds are supposed to be
in the pytest scripts.
"RTC memory should be lowest priority and its free size should be big enough"
was failing because the expected size of RTC heap left after init was bigger
than the total RTC size itself.
The test was updated to:
- check that the minimum free RTC heap size matches the current size
- the current RTC heap size is bigger than 80% of the total RTC memory region
IDF_BUILD_V2 does not have BUILD_COMPONENTS build property. Therefore,
when IDF_BUILD_V2 is defined, use a generator expressions instead. I
believe that the one-liner should also work with IDF_BUILD_V1, but the
change is kept separate to clearly show the difference between
IDF_BUILD_V1 and IDF_BUILD_V2.
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <frantisek.hrbata@espressif.com>
Add a condition on the definition of the MALLOC_CAP_EXEC macro to
prevent it from being defined if ESP_SYSTEM_MEMPROT_FEATURE or
ESP_SYSTEM_PMP_IDRAM_SPLIT is enabled, thus throwing a compile time
error when using it.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/14837
The following updates have been made in this commit:
- The commit places FreeRTOS code in flash memory by default.
- CONFIG_FREERTOS_PLACE_FUNCTIONS_INTO_FLASH has been removed.
- CONFIG_FREERTOS_IN_IRAM is unhidden and can be used to restore the
previous memory placement.
- A test has been added for users to conduct performance impact testing
based on memory placement configurations.