fix(security): add anti-FI checks while setting up PSRAM encryption

This commit is contained in:
Mahavir Jain
2025-09-30 10:22:53 +05:30
parent 729be4656b
commit ad059d385b
6 changed files with 36 additions and 2 deletions
+11 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2022-2024 Espressif Systems (Shanghai) CO LTD
* SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2022-2025 Espressif Systems (Shanghai) CO LTD
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
*/
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include "soc/soc_caps.h"
#include "hal/assert.h"
#include "hal/mmu_types.h"
#include "esp_fault.h"
#if SOC_EFUSE_SUPPORTED
#include "hal/efuse_ll.h"
#include "hal/efuse_hal.h"
@@ -225,6 +226,15 @@ __attribute__((always_inline)) static inline void mmu_ll_write_entry(uint32_t mm
mmu_raw_value = mmu_val | SOC_MMU_VALID;
REG_WRITE(SPI_MEM_MMU_ITEM_INDEX_REG(0), entry_id);
REG_WRITE(SPI_MEM_MMU_ITEM_CONTENT_REG(0), mmu_raw_value);
// Anti-FI check to confirm the encryption status for PSRAM entry.
// This avoids a potential FI attacks to keep PSRAM unencrypted and
// hence read out plaintext in execute from PSRAM model.
if (mmu_ll_cache_encryption_enabled() && target == MMU_TARGET_PSRAM0 && efuse_hal_chip_revision() > 100) {
ESP_FAULT_ASSERT(REG_READ(SPI_MEM_MMU_ITEM_CONTENT_REG(0)) & SOC_MMU_SENSITIVE);
} else {
ESP_FAULT_ASSERT(!(mmu_ll_cache_encryption_enabled() && mmu_id == MMU_LL_PSRAM_MMU_ID && efuse_hal_chip_revision() > 100));
}
}
/**