fix(storage/fatfs): fix FAT32 mount integer overflow (CVE-2026-6682)

The initial CVE-2026-6682 fix (merged in !50362) hardened the exFAT
mount path, but the CVE as reported by runZero is a FAT32 defect in
mount_volume() and is reachable in ESP-IDF's default configuration
(exFAT and 64-bit LBA disabled). This corrects the fix.

Root cause: `fasize *= fs->n_fats` is a DWORD multiply with no overflow
guard. A crafted BPB_FATSz32 such as 0x80000001 with NumFATs=2 wraps
`fasize` to 0x00000002. The wrapped (too-small) FAT size then places
`fs->database` inside the FAT region, so a forged directory entry in the
overlapping sector yields an attacker-controlled `finfo.fsize`. Any
caller that uses that size as a read length overflows its buffer with
attacker-controlled bytes (CVSS 7.6, path to RCE). The later
`fs->fsize < szbfat` check does not catch this because it compares the
un-doubled single-FAT size, which is still large.

Fix: reject a per-FAT size that overflows DWORD when multiplied by the
FAT count, and reject a reserved+FAT+root system-area size that overflows
DWORD, before either value is used to derive the data-area base.

The previous exFAT cluster-heap/bitmap 64-bit promotions are retained as
defense-in-depth and their comments relabeled accordingly (they are not
CVE-2026-6682). The SBOM cve-exclude-list reason is updated to describe
the FAT32 overflow and its fix.
This commit is contained in:
Tomáš Rohlínek
2026-07-07 16:36:30 +02:00
parent 5fde421955
commit 6a20a83421
2 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions
+4 -2
View File
@@ -3561,7 +3561,7 @@ static FRESULT mount_volume ( /* FR_OK(0): successful, !=0: an error occurred */
fs->volbase = bsect;
fs->database = bsect + ld_32(fs->win + BPB_DataOfsEx);
fs->fatbase = bsect + ld_32(fs->win + BPB_FatOfsEx);
if (maxlba < (QWORD)fs->database + (QWORD)ncl * fs->csize) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* CVE-2026-6682: promote to 64-bit before multiply to avoid integer overflow that would accept an undersized volume */
if (maxlba < (QWORD)fs->database + (QWORD)ncl * fs->csize) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* exFAT mount hardening (defense-in-depth): promote to 64-bit before multiply to avoid integer overflow that would accept an undersized volume */
fs->dirbase = ld_32(fs->win + BPB_RootClusEx);
/* Get bitmap location and check if it is contiguous (implementation assumption) */
@@ -3577,7 +3577,7 @@ static FRESULT mount_volume ( /* FR_OK(0): successful, !=0: an error occurred */
}
bcl = ld_32(fs->win + i + 20); /* Bitmap cluster */
if (bcl < 2 || bcl >= fs->n_fatent) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* (Wrong cluster#) */
fs->bitbase = fs->database + (LBA_t)fs->csize * (bcl - 2); /* Bitmap sector (CVE-2026-6682: 64-bit multiply to avoid overflow) */
fs->bitbase = fs->database + (LBA_t)fs->csize * (bcl - 2); /* Bitmap sector (exFAT mount hardening: 64-bit multiply to avoid overflow) */
for (;;) { /* Check if bitmap is contiguous */
if (move_window(fs, fs->fatbase + bcl / (SS(fs) / 4)) != FR_OK) return FR_DISK_ERR;
cv = ld_32(fs->win + bcl % (SS(fs) / 4) * 4);
@@ -3603,6 +3603,7 @@ static FRESULT mount_volume ( /* FR_OK(0): successful, !=0: an error occurred */
fs->n_fats = fs->win[BPB_NumFATs]; /* Number of FATs */
if (fs->n_fats != 1 && fs->n_fats != 2) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* (Must be 1 or 2) */
if (fs->n_fats == 2 && fasize > 0xFFFFFFFF / 2) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* CVE-2026-6682: reject a per-FAT size that overflows DWORD when multiplied by the FAT count; a wrapped (too-small) fasize would move the data area into the FAT region and let a crafted image forge a directory entry with an attacker-controlled file size */
fasize *= fs->n_fats; /* Number of sectors for FAT area */
fs->csize = fs->win[BPB_SecPerClus]; /* Cluster size */
@@ -3619,6 +3620,7 @@ static FRESULT mount_volume ( /* FR_OK(0): successful, !=0: an error occurred */
/* Determine the FAT sub type */
sysect = nrsv + fasize + fs->n_rootdir / (SS(fs) / SZDIRE); /* RSV + FAT + FF_DIR */
if (sysect < fasize) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* CVE-2026-6682: reject reserved+FAT+root system-area size that overflows DWORD (same data-area displacement as the FAT-count overflow above) */
if (tsect < sysect) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* (Invalid volume size) */
nclst = (tsect - sysect) / fs->csize; /* Number of clusters */
if (nclst == 0) return FR_NO_FILESYSTEM; /* (Invalid volume size) */