- If we don't know the parent (=In-Reply-To) message, then completely recreate the group member list
(i.e. use the member list of the incoming message) (because we assume that we missed some messages
& have a wrong group state).
- If the message has a "Chat-Group-Member-Removed: member@example.com" header, then remove this
member.
- If the message has a "Chat-Group-Member-Added: member@example.com" header, then add this member.
That means:
- Remove checks for the presense of `ContactId::SELF` in the group. Thus all recipients of a message
take the same decision about group membership changes, no matter if they are in the group
currently. This fixes a situation when a recipient thinks it's not a member because it missed a
message about its addition before.
NOTE: But always recreate membership list if SELF has been added. The older versions of DC don't
always set "In-Reply-To" to the latest message they sent, but to the latest delivered message (so
it's a race), so we need this heuristic currently.
- Recreate the group member list if we don't know the parent (=In-Reply-To) message, even if the
sender isn't in the group as per our view, because we missed some messages and our view may be
stale.
The new message for which `parent_query()` is done may assume that it will be received in a context
affected by those messages, e.g. they could add new members to a group and the new message will
contain them in "To:". Anyway recipients must be prepared to orphaned references.
If the user makes a backup from a UI that supports the experimental verified 1:1 chats (e.g. nightly Android) and imports it into a UI that doesn't, then this config should be cleared.
We already talked about this a long time ago after @Simon-Laux noticed this problem, but I think we didn't actually solve it back then?
Best to review with whitespace changes disabled.
I.e. exclude from the list the following chats as well:
- Read-only mailing lists.
- Chats we're not a member of.
But as for ProtectionBroken chats, we return them, as that may happen to a verified chat at any
time. It may be confusing if a chat that is normally in the list disappears suddenly. The UI need to
deal with that case anyway.
(cherry picked from commit 83ef25e7de)
I.e. exclude from the list the following chats as well:
- Read-only mailing lists.
- Chats we're not a member of.
But as for ProtectionBroken chats, we return them, as that may happen to a verified chat at any
time. It may be confusing if a chat that is normally in the list disappears suddenly. The UI need to
deal with that case anyway.
If a message is unsigned or signed with an unknown key, `MimeMessage::was_encrypted()` returns
false. So, it mustn't be checked when deciding whether to look into
`MimeMessage::decoded_data`. Looking through git history one can see that it's just a wrong check
left in the code for historical reasons.
Other MUAs don't set add/remove headers, so the only way for them to re-add us to the group is to
add us to To/CC/wherever. Previously it worked only for other members that are still in the group so
that they properly handled our re-addition, but we didn't.
Check if a sticker has at least one fully transparent corner and otherwise change the Sticker type
to Image. This would fix both Android and iOS at the same time and prevent similar bug on future
platforms that may get this bug like Ubuntu Touch.
I.e. from delete_msgs(). Otherwise messages must not be deleted from there, e.g. if a message is
ephemeral, but a network outage lasts longer than the ephemeral message timer, the message still
must be sent upon a successful reconnection.
I.e. from delete_msgs(). Otherwise messages must not be deleted from there, e.g. if a message is
ephemeral, but a network outage lasts longer than the ephemeral message timer, the message still
must be sent upon a successful reconnection.
If the Inbox is fetched before the Sentbox (as done currently), messages from the Sentbox will
correctly mingle with the Inbox messages in the end. So, this commit changes message ordering only
if we already have processed outgoing messages, e.g. if we just sent them in the chat as described
in #4621. Otherwise new incoming messages are displayed somewhere in the middle of the chat which
doesn't look usable.
