As we are using a dedicated CI relay instance, we don't need to be careful with creating test addresses.
But re-using test addresses in a test running in a single worker can leak events/messages which compromises test isolation.
Instead of encountering random flaky tests because let's just not cache addresses to maximize test isolation.
Fix https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/8195
Supersedes https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/8217
The most interesting change is in `delete_expired_imap_messages()`
because there, messages are marked for deletion on single-device
chatmail profiles.
The logic in `delete_expired_imap_messages()` was wrong before, and
pre-messages were not deleted at all. This is fixed by also querying
`pre_rfc724_mid` in addition to `rfc724_mid` from the `msgs` table.
In order not to make the SQL statement too complex, I split it into two.
WRT tests:
- `test_immediate_autodelete()` tests the auto-deletion;
`test_imap_autodelete_fully_downloaded_msg()` tests that even for a
message that is split into pre- and post-message, both messages are
deleted.
- A lot of tests test that if bcc_self is on, messages are not
auto-deleted. E.g. `test_one_account_send_bcc_setting()` and
`test_markseen_message_and_mdn()` relies on the fact that messages stay
on the server when bcc_self is on.
- Unfortunately, it is not possible to test that messages are only
deleted for chatmail servers, because we don't have any tests that use a
non-chatmail server.
The motivation is to reduce code complexity, get rid of the extra IMAP connection and cases when
messages are added to chats by Inbox and Sentbox loops in parallel which leads to various message
sorting bugs, particularly to outgoing messages breaking sorting of incoming ones which are fetched
later, but may have a smaller "Date".
Create unprotected group in test_create_protected_grp_multidev
The test is renamed accordingly.
SystemMessage::ChatE2ee is added in encrypted groups
regardless of whether they are protected or not.
Previously new encrypted unprotected groups
had no message saying that messages are end-to-end encrypted
at all.
this PR adds a info message "messages are end-to-end-encrypted" also for
chats created by eg. vcards. by the removal of lock icons, this is a
good place to hint for that in addition; this is also what eg. whatsapp
and others are doing
the wording itself is tweaked at
https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/pull/3817 (and there is
also the rough idea to make the message a little more outstanding, by
some more dedicated colors)
~~did not test in practise, if this leads to double "e2ee info messages"
on secure join, tests look good, however.~~ EDIT: did lots of practise
tests meanwhile :)
most of the changes in this PR are about test ...
ftr, in another PR, after 2.0 reeases, there could probably quite some
code cleanup wrt set-protection, protection-disabled etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Move all `configured_*` parameters into a new SQL table `transports`.
All `configured_*` parameters are deprecated; the only exception is
`configured_addr`, which is used to store the address of the primary
transport. Currently, there can only ever be one primary transport (i.e.
the `transports` table only ever has one row); this PR is not supposed
to change DC's behavior in any meaningful way.
This is a preparation for mt.
---------
Co-authored-by: l <link2xt@testrun.org>
I.e. treat `DeleteServerAfter == None` as "delete at once". But when a backup is exported, set
`DeleteServerAfter` to 0 so that the server decides when to delete messages, in order not to break
the multi-device case. Even if a backup is not aimed for deploying more devices, `DeleteServerAfter`
must be set to 0, otherwise the backup is half-useful because after a restoration the user wouldn't
see new messages deleted by the device after the backup was done. But if the user explicitly set
`DeleteServerAfter`, don't change it when exporting a backup. Anyway even for non-chatmail case the
app should warn the user before a backup export if they have `DeleteServerAfter` enabled.
Also do the same after a backup import. While this isn't reliable as we can crash in between, this
is a problem only for old backups, new backups already have `DeleteServerAfter` set if necessary.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Bot processes are run asynchronously, so we shouldn't send messages to a bot before it's fully
initialised and skipped existing messages for processing, i.e. before DC_EVENT_IMAP_INBOX_IDLE is
emitted.
The way it was implemented it threw out all remaining messages after finding the next incoming
message. Better use FFIEventTracker functions, they are used in all the tests anyway.
link2xt
holger krekel
Hocuri
iequidoo
bjoernandHocuri
iequidooandHocuri
missytake
Sebastian Klähn
adbenitez