Looks like this doesn't fix anything currently, because a better message from
`apply_group_changes()` doesn't appear in a context with another better message, but why drop it if
it's possible to add it, moreover, messages about implicit member additions are never dropped while
looking less important.
The second SQL statement calculating chat size
was already fixed in f656cb29be,
but more important statement calculating member list intersection
was overlooked.
As a result, trash chat with members added there due to former bugs
could still appear in similar chats.
- Reduce cross-module dependencies.
- Stop bloating the `sync` module while implementing synchronisation of more entities.
- Now there's the only `ChatId` :)
An error while executing an item mustn't prevent next items from being executed. There was a comment
that only critical errors like db write failures must be reported upstack, but in fact it's hard to
achieve in the current design, there are no error codes or so, so it's bug-prone. E.g.
`ChatAction::Block` and `Unblock` already reported all errors upstack. So, let's make error handling
the same as everywhere and just ignore any errors in the item execution loop. In the worst case we
just do more unsuccessful db writes f.e.
It's sufficient if the local state is updated successfully, no need to fail the whole
operation. Anyway delivery of sync messages and applying them on other devices are beyond of our
control. If an error occurs when generating a sync messages, probably a log message is sufficient,
no need to even show it to a user. As for the tests, anyway there are ones on synchronisation which
perform necessary checks. Particularly, some sync messages can't be generated if an account is
unconfigured. Adding the corresponding checks to the device synchronisation code (and maybe even
more checks in the future) would complicate the code unnecessarily. Even errors caused by bugs in
this code aren't a reason to fail a local operation.
Sync chat contacts across devices for broadcast lists and groups. This needs the corresponding chat
to exist on other devices which is not the case for unpromoted groups, so it fails for them now but
it's only a warning and will work once creation of unpromoted groups is synchronised too.
List-ID header is added for broadcast lists.
UTF-8 in email headers is allowed only if
all recipient MTAs support SMTPUTF8 extension,
which is not always the case even if our submission service
reports SMTPUTF8 support.
Don't grow timeout if interrupted early and slept not enough. Also:
- Don't grow timeout too fast, but 1.5--2 times (randomly) per iteration.
- Don't interrupt if rate-limited.
- Reset timeout if rate-limited. Rate limit isn't an error, so we can start from 30 secs again if an
error happens then.
When a key is gossiped for the contact in a verified chat,
it is stored in the secondary verified key slot.
The messages are then encrypted to the secondary verified key
if they are also encrypted to the contact introducing this secondary key.
Chat-Group-Member-Added no longer updates the verified key.
Verified group recovery only relies on the secondary verified key.
When a message is received from a contact
signed with a secondary verified key,
secondary verified key replaces the primary verified key.
When verified key is changed for the contact
in response to receiving a message
signed with a secondary verified key,
"Setup changed" message is added
to the same chat where the message is received.
this pr keeps and refines documentation added in #4951, however, reverts
the api introduced by #4951
which turns out to be not useful for UI in practise:
UI anyway check for chat/no-chat beforehand,
so a simple condition in profiles as
`green_checkmark = chat_exist ? chat_is_protected() :
contact_is_verified()`
is more useful in practise and is waht UI need and did already in the
past. (https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/pull/2836 shows a
detailed discussion)
(as a side effect, beside saving code,
this PR saves up to three database calls
(get contact from chat in UI to pass it to profile_is_verified(), get
chat from contact in core, load is_protected in core) - instead, core
can use already is_protected from already loaded chat object)
/me did check rust-tests, fingers crossed for python tests
/me should re-setup python tests on local machine at some point :)
This message makes that partial messages do not change the group state.
A simple fix and a comprehensive test is added. This is a follow up to
the former #4841 which took a different approach.
This is another approach to provide group membership consistency for all members. Considerations:
- Classical MUA users usually don't intend to remove users from an email thread, so if they removed
a recipient then it was probably by accident.
- DC users could miss new member additions and then better to handle this in the same way as for
classical MUA messages. Moreover, if we remove a member implicitly, they will never know that and
continue to think they're still here.
But it shouldn't be a big problem if somebody missed a member removal, because they will likely
recreate the member list from the next received message. The problem occurs only if that "somebody"
managed to reply earlier. Really, it's a problem for big groups with high message rate, but let it
be for now.
Ensure the client does not busy loop
skipping IDLE if UIDNEXT of the mailbox is higher than
the last seen UID plus 1, e.g. if the message
with UID=UIDNEXT-1 was deleted before we fetched it.
We do not fallback to UIDNEXT=1 anymore
if the STATUS command cannot determine UIDNEXT.
There are no known IMAP servers with broken STATUS so far.
This allows to guarantee that select_with_uidvalidity()
sets UIDNEXT for the mailbox and use it in fetch_new_messages()
to ensure that UIDNEXT always advances even
when there are no messages to fetch.
Before, it was shown by UI when the chat is empty, however, in case of
verified groups, this is never the case any longer as the 'e2ee now
guaranteed' is always added.
Green checkmark in the contact profile
should only be displayed in the title
if the same checkmark is displayed in the title of 1:1 chat.
If 1:1 chat does not exist,
the checkmark should not be displayed in the title
of the contact profile.
Also add docs to is_protected
property of FullChat and BasicChat JSON objects.
