Add a new crate `deltachat_time` with a fake `struct SystemTimeTools` for mocking
`SystemTime::now()` for test purposes. One still needs to use `std::time::SystemTime` as a struct
representing a system time. I think such a minimalistic approach is ok -- even if somebody uses the
original `SystemTime::now()` instead of the mock by mistake, that could break only tests but not the
program itself. The worst thing that can happen is that tests using `SystemTime::shift()` and
checking messages timestamps f.e. wouldn't catch the corresponding bugs, but now we don't have such
tests at all which is much worse.
If a time value doesn't need to be sent to another host, saved to the db or otherwise used across
program restarts, a monotonically nondecreasing clock (`Instant`) should be used. But as `Instant`
may use `libc::clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)`, e.g. on Android, and does not advance while being in
deep sleep mode, get rid of `Instant` in favor of using `SystemTime`, but add `tools::Time` as an
alias for it with the appropriate comment so that it's clear why `Instant` isn't used in those
places and to protect from unwanted usages of `Instant` in the future. Also this can help to switch
to another clock impl if we find any.
close#4620
This PR introduces a new core API to parse mailto links into a uniform
data format. This could be used to unify the different implementations
on the current platforms.
To complete this PR we have to decide for which APIs we want to expose
this (now) internal API (c, python, json-rpc, etc.), and if we want such
an API at all as it doesn't have a corresponding UI-PR and is not
_really_ needed.
Message.set_text() and Message.get_text() are modified accordingly
to accept String and return String.
Messages which previously contained None text
are now represented as messages with empty text.
Use Message.set_text("".to_string())
instead of Message.set_text(None).
bjoern <r10s@b44t.com> wrote:
> maybe_add_time_based_warnings() requires some date guaranteed to be in the near past. based on
this known date we check if the system clock is wrong (if earlier than known date) and if the used
Delta Chat version may be outdated (1 year passed since known date). while this does not catch all
situations, it catches quite some errors with comparable few effort.
>
> figuring out the date guaranteed to be in the near past is a bit tricky. that time, we added
get_provider_update_timestamp() for exactly that purpose - it is checked manually by some dev and
updated from time to time, usually before a release.
>
> however, meanwhile, the provider-db gets updated less frequently - things might be settled a bit
more - and, get_provider_update_timestamp() was also changed to return the date of the last commit,
instead of last run. while that seem to be more on-purpose, we cannot even do an “empty” database
update to update the known date.
>
> as get_provider_update_timestamp() is not used for anything else, maybe we should completely
remove that function and replace it by get_last_release_timestamp that is then updated by
./scripts/set_core_version.py - the result of that is reviewed manually anyway, so that seems to be
a good place (i prefer manual review here and mistrust further automation as also dev or ci clocks
may be wrong :)
get_chat_msgs() function is split into new get_chat_msgs() without flags
and get_chat_msgs_ex() which accepts booleans instead of bitflags.
FFI call dc_get_chat_msgs() is still using bitflags for compatibility.
JSON-RPC calls get_message_ids() and get_message_list_items()
accept booleans instead of bitflags now.
* Treat multiple From addresses as if there was no From: addr
* changelog
* Don't send invalid emails through the whole receive_imf pipeline
Instead, directly create a trash entry for them.
* Don't create trash entries for randomly generated Message-Id's
* clippy
* fix typo
Co-authored-by: link2xt <link2xt@testrun.org>
Fix#3507
Note that this is not intended for a release at this point! We first have to test whether it runs stable enough. If we want to make a release while we are not confident enough in authres-checking, then we have to disable it.
BTW, most of the 3000 new lines are in `test_data/messages/dkimchecks...`, not the actual code
da3a4b94 adds the results to the Message info. It currently does this by adding them to `hop_info`. Maybe we should rename `hop_info` to `extra_info` or something; this has the disadvantage that we can't rename the sql column name though.
Follow-ups for this could be:
- In `update_authservid_candidates()`: Implement the rest of the algorithm @hpk42 and me thought about. What's missing is remembering how sure we are that these are the right authserv-ids. Esp., when receiving a message sent from another account at the same domain, we can be quite sure that the authserv-ids in there are the ones of our email server. This will make authres-checking work with buzon.uy, disroot.org, yandex.ru, mailo.com, and riseup.net.
- Think about how we present this to the user - e.g. currently the only change is that we don't accept key changes, which will mean that the small lock on the message is not shown.
- And it will mean that we can fully enable AEAP, after revisiting the security implications of this, and assuming everyone (esp. @link2xt who pointed out the problems in the first place) feels comfortable with it.
Very small PR; Motivation: Easier navigation using Go-To-definition.
Because, using go-to-definition of rust-analyzer on parse() doesn't take you to the actual parse() implementation but its trait definiton. On the other hand, it's very easy to find EmailAddress::new().
* truncate incoming messages by lines,
because many linebreaks seem to cause the chat open delay on deltachat-ios
* run cargo fmt
* remove DC_DESIRED_TEXT_LINES_THRESHOLD
and use Strings instead of Cow<str>
* remove usage of clippy::indexing_slicing in truncate_by_lines (#3596)
* adjust comments
* Fix truncate_by_lines tests
* Reword indexing/slicing error
* Remove unnecessary conditional
* Fix a typo in the comment
Co-authored-by: link2xt <link2xt@testrun.org>
