* Copypaste-merge my old work
* Start implementing mailinglists the new way
* Create pseudo contact
* Fine-tune docs
* Remove some unnecessary changes
* style
* Make a stock str
* Fix a crash. Yes, this line caused a panic when reconfiguring on Android
(without a reasonable error log). Also, I could not receive any messages
anymore.
* rfmt
* Add tests and make them pass
* Even more tests
* rfmt
* Enhance test and fix bug
* Don't update the sender name when prefetching because maybe it's a mailing list
* Use an enum instead of numbers for the decision
* Don't remove anyone from mailing lists
* Fix bug in the regex
* Adjust error msg
* Compile error after rebase
* Correctly emit event
* Add dc_msg_is_mailing_list so that you can find out whether messages in the deaddrop belong to mailing lists.
* Add received headers to unit tests
* Comments, small tweaks
* Use dc_msg_get_override_sender_name instead of dc_msg_get_sender_name
* Add dc_msg_get_sender_first_name() because sometimes the first name was not correctly shown in mailing lists
* small fixes, don't let the user modify mailing list groups
* Hide contacts for addresses like noreply@github.com and reply+AEJ...@reply.github.com
When testing mailing lists, I noticed that sometimes a mailing list
contact got a name (like, hocuri <noreply@github.com>). It turned out
that ages ago, I had accidentally written an email to - in this example
- hocuri <noreply@github.com> and it had been added to the contacts
list.
This hides email addresses from the contacts list that are obviously not
meant to be written at and prevents updating the names.
* Comment, clippy
* Replace u32 with ChatId
* Resolve lost of small issues from the reviews
* remove dc_msg_get_sender_first_name
* add dc_msg_get_real_chat_id()
this allows to check if a contact request belongs to a mailing list
and to show name/avatar/whatever of the mailinglist.
another approach was to duplicate some chat-apis for messages
(eg. dc_msg_is_mailing_list()) however that would require far more new apis.
the idea to change the behavior of dc_msg_get_chat_id() would be
more clean, however, that easily breaks existing implementations
and can led to hard to find bugs.
* remove now unused Message.is_mailing_list()
* if a name for a mailing list is missing, use List-ID
* fix comment
* fix error message
* document how dc_get_chat_contacts() works for mailing lists
* refine decide api (#2185)
* add DC_DECIDE* constants to deltachat.h, tweak documentation
* use StartChat/Block/NotNow instead of Yes/Never/NotNow
* decide_on_contact_request works on ctx/msg-id
functions working on message-objects
usually do not read or write directly on the database.
therefore, decide_on_contact_request()
should not work with message-objects as well,
it is even a bit misleading, as eg. chat-id of the object is not modified.
instead, the function works on context,
similar to dc_send_msg(), dc_create_chat() and so on.
for now, i moved it to context, could maybe be part od MsgId.
* Update src/chatlist.rs
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
* refine documentation
* re-add accidentally deleted Param::MailingList
* remove pseudo-contact in domain @mailing.list
1. the pseudo-contact was added to the mailing list contacts,
which is not needed.
might be that we want to add the recent contacts there in a subsequent pr
(we do not know all contacts of a mailing list)
2. the pseudo-contact was used to block
mailing lists; this is done by setting the chat to Blocked::Manually now
3- the pseudo-contact was used for unblocking;
as it is very neat not to require additional ui for mailing list unblocking,
might be that we introduce a similar pseudo-contact for this limited purpose
in a subsequent pr, however, the pseudo-contact needs to exist only
during unblocking then, maybe also the special domain is not needed,
we'll see :)
* Move dc_decide_on_contact_request() up to the dc_context section as it's a member of dc_context now
More specifically, to the "handle messages" section
* re-introduce Chattype::Mailinglist (#2195)
* re-introduce Chattype::Mailinglist
* exhaustive chattype-check in fetch_existing_msgs() and get_summary2()
* exhaustive chattype-check in ndn_maybe_add_info_msg()
* exhaustive chattype-check in message::fill()
* remove dc_chat_is_mailing_list() from ffi
Co-authored-by: B. Petersen <r10s@b44t.com>
Read all of an e-mail accounts messages and extract all To/CC addresses
if the From was from our own account.
Then, fetch existing messages from the server and show them.
Also, I fixed two other things:
- just by chance my test failed because of an completely unrelated bug.
The bug: bcc_self messages were not marked as read if mvbox_move was set
to true.
- add some color to the test output (minor change)
both are not used in productive:
- chat-id "in-creation" was dropped completely already in core-c
as it does not allow assigning messages to chats in time.
- message flag "starred" was added at some point and never used.
ux-wise, "disappearing messages" promises to clean up a chat -
this does not fit well with "starring" messages.
"saved messages" chat seems to be superior in that regard.
but anyway, it is not used but comes at maintainance costs,
so it is better to delete its functionality for now.
(the db entries, however, are left for now,
that might be more tricky to remove)
This turns the Bob::expects field into an enum, removing the old
constants. It also makes the field private, nothi0ng outside the
securejoin module uses it.
Finally it documents stuff, including a seemingly-unrelated Param.
But that param is used by the securejoin module... It's nice to have
doc tooltips be helpful.
this pr allows prefixing custom jitsi urls with `jitsi:`
so that clients have a chance to detect these custom instances
and may start the corresponding app.
This more strongly types the ubiquitous message id type by no longer
making it an integer. It keeps the actual ID opaque. Only for the
generic job API the number keeps being used. Some locations also need
to create it from an integer and call MsgId::new().
* add sticker type
this pr adds the message type 'sticker'.
stickers are handled as normal images
but tagged with the header `Chat-Content: sticker`
it's up to the ui to render these stickers appropriate.
* cargo fmt