It can be used e.g. as a default in the file saving dialog. Also display the original filename in
the message info. For these purposes add Param::Filename in addition to Param::File and use it as an
attachment filename in sent emails.
Opening the same account (context) from multiple processes is dangerous, can result in duplicate
downloads of the same message etc. Same for account manager, attempts to modify the same
accounts.toml even if done atomically with may result in corrupted files as atomic replacement
procedure does not expect that multiple processes may write to the same temporary file.
accounts.toml cannot be used as a lockfile because it is replaced during atomic update. Therefore, a
new file next to accounts.toml is needed to prevent starting second account manager in the same
directory.
But iOS needs to be able to open accounts from multiple processes at the same time. This is required
as the "share-to-DC extension" is a separate process by iOS design -- this process may or may not be
started while the main app is running. Accounts are not altered however by this extension, so let's
add to the `Accounts::new()` constructor an `rdwr` parameter which allows to read the accounts
config w/o locking the lockfile.
Webxdc update messages may contain
long lines that get hard-wrapped
and may corrupt JSON if the message
is not encrypted.
base64-encode the update part
to avoid hard wrapping.
This is not necessary for encrypted
messages, but does not introduce
size overhead as OpenPGP messages
are compressed.
Correctly handle messages with old timestamps for verified chats:
* They must not be sorted over a protection-changed info message
* If they change the protection, then they must not be sorted over existing other messages, because then the protection-changed info message would also be above these existing messages.
This PR fixes this:
1. Even seen messages can't be sorted into already-noticed messages anymore. **This also changes DC's behavior in the absence of verified 1:1 chats**. Before this PR, messages that are marked as seen when they are downloaded will always be sorted by their timestamp, even if it's very old.
2. protection-changed info messages are always sorted to the bottom.
**Edit:**
3. There is an exception to rule 1: Outgoing messages are still allowed to be sorted purely by their timestamp, and don't influence old messages. This is to the problem described at [*].
Together, these rules also make sure that the protection-changed info message is always right above the message causing the change.
[*] If we receive messages from two different folders, e.g. `Sent` and `Inbox`, then this will lead to wrong message ordering in many cases. I need to think about this more, or maybe someone else has an idea. One new idea that came to my mind is:
* Always sort noticed messages under the newest info message (this PR sorts them under the newest noticed message, master sorts them purely by their sent timestamp)
* Always sort unnoticed messages under the newest noticed message (that's the same behavior as in this PR and on master)
* Always sort protection-changed info messages to the bottom (as in this PR)
However, after a talk with @link2xt we instead decided to add rule 3. (see above) because it seemed a little bit easier.
If the verification is broken, `can_send()` is false.
But if the user was typing a message right when a verification-breaking message came in, the UI still needs to be able to save it as a draft.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Set a draft
- Your chat partner breaks verification
- Go back to the chats list
- Go to the chat again
- Accept the breakage
- Expected: The draft is still there
- Bug behavior: The draft is gone
Some Dovecot servers are configured
to alias "INBOX.DeltaChat" and "DeltaChat" to the same folder.
In this case Delta Chat moves new emails from "INBOX"
to "DeltaChat", but then discovers the same mail in "INBOX.DeltaChat"
and tries to move it to "DeltaChat" again.
Each time a MOVE command is issued to move the message
from "INBOX.DeltaChat" to "DeltaChat", the message gets a new UID.
To prevent such IMAP move loop between aliased folders,
we do not move the message if we have already seen it on IMAP,
i.e. we have its Message-ID in the `imap` table.
Note that we do not use `rfc724_mid_exists`,
because it checks the `msgs` table and would consider
BCC-self messages seen even before we see them in the Inbox,
preventing their move to the DeltaChat folder.
Duplicate messages and messages without Message-IDs
are not moved anymore, but this is better
than having an infinite move loop.
1:1 chats are automatically created as protected if the contact is
verified, there is no need to explicitly do this.
Plus, by removing this call, the test also tests that automatically
creating 1:1 chats as protected works.
receive_imf() calls add_parts()
which INSERTs or UPDATEs the message using UPSERT [1].
It then uses last_insert_rowid() to get
the ID of the inserted message.
However, it is incorrect to use last_insert_rowid()
if an UPDATE was executed instead of INSERT.
The solution is to use `RETURNING id` clause
to make the UPSERT statement return message ID in any case [2].
The fix is tested in test_webxdc_update_for_not_downloaded_instance()
and with a debug_assert!.
[1] https://www.sqlite.org/lang_UPSERT.html
[2] https://sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/9ce3bc1c4a85c15f
This commit adds new stock strings
"I added member ...",
"I removed member ..." and
"I left the group" that are sent over the network
and are visible in classic MUAs like Thunderbird.
Member name in these messages uses authname
instead of the display name,
so the name set locally does not get leaked when
a member is added or removed.
Message.set_text() and Message.get_text() are modified accordingly
to accept String and return String.
Messages which previously contained None text
are now represented as messages with empty text.
Use Message.set_text("".to_string())
instead of Message.set_text(None).
simplify() is written to process incoming plaintext messages
and extract footers and quotes from them.
Incoming messages contain various quote styles
and simplify() implements heuristics to detects them.
If dehtml() output is processed by simplify(),
simplify() heuristics may erroneously detect
footers and quotes in produced plaintext.
dehtml() should directly detect quotes
instead of converting them to plaintext quotes
for parsing with simplify().
