Also resultified `get_watched_folders`.
Python test `test_moved_markseen` is modified to test using incoming
message instead of BCC-self message, because BCC-self message is
detected immediately in the Inbox.
`imap` table maps Message-IDs to UIDs on the server. `dc_receive_imf`
no longer gets the UID of the message as an argument and does not
insert the folder and UID of the message into the `msgs`
table. `server_folder` and `server_uid` columns in `msgs` table are
deprecated.
MoveMsg and DeleteMsgOnImap jobs are removed. Now messages are moved
and deleted only in the `fetch_move_delete` procedure that consults
the `target` column of the `imap` table to determine where the message
should go.
Where the message should go is determined after prefetching by the
`imap::target_folder()` procedure. Messages are only downloaded once
they reach their target folder to avoid race conditions in multidevice
setting, such as:
1. One device trying to FETCH the message while the other tries to
MOVE it.
2. One device marking the message as \Seen in the Inbox while the
other has already copied unseen message to the Movebox and is going to
delete the \Seen message in the Inbox.
3. Device downloads the message from the Inbox while there are newer
messages in the Movebox placed there by the other device, thus
processing the messages out of order.
- Check that member modifying the group is in the group themselves.
It is not allowed to readd yourself to the group or remove someone without being in the group themselves.
- Unify code for group member addition and removal.
Removing a member now recreates the group member list from the To: field.
Removed member from the Chat-Group-Member-Removed was in the To: field in previous Delta Chat versions,
so it is excluded explicity. New versions of Delta Chat put removed member in Bcc: instead.
- Apply avatar changes after updating the group member list.
This allows to check that the contact modifying the avatar is actually a group member.
When there is an outgoing message in a chat, mark all older messages in this chat as seen.
Android already has a similar behavior, however, this led to the issue https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/issues/2163 and should be changed back.
--
From the issue description at https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/issues/2163, I implemented these fixes:
> Core should take care that if the last message in a chat is not fresh|noticed, no messages in the chat can be fresh. [...] Do this [...] in a function that's called at the end of fetch_new_messages(). Then dc_receive_imf() wouldn't get slower by this and we could re-use the same function for migration.
So, I didn't do this inside `dc_receive_imf()` in order not to make it take even longer. This obviously has the downside of higher complexity.
And I think we should implement this:
> On Androd, show the unread badge when unread!=0 again (see deltachat/deltachat-android@618af02). Then the user can see that there is a chat with an unread message and click it to get rid of it.
because it shouldn't be the UI's job to decide whether an unread badge is shown, but the core's.
utcfromtimestamp() is not recommended by the official documentation,
because many methods, including timestamp(), work incorrectly with
"naive" datetimes returned by utcfromtimestamp().
Contact request chats are not merged into a single virtual "deaddrop"
chat anymore. Instead, they are shown in the chatlist the same way as
other chats, but sending of messages to them is not allowed and MDNs
are not sent automatically until the chat is "accepted" by the user.
New API:
- dc_chat_is_contact_request(): returns true if chat is a contact
request. In this case option to accept and block the chat via
dc_accept_chat() and dc_block_chat() should be shown in the UI.
- dc_accept_chat(): accept contact request and unblock the chat
- dc_block_chat(): decline contact request and block the chat
Removed API:
- dc_create_chat_by_msg_id(): deprecated 2021-02-07 in favor of
dc_decide_on_contact_request()
- dc_marknoticed_contact(): deprecated 2021-02-07 in favor of
dc_decide_on_contact_request()
- dc_decide_on_contact_request(): this call requires a message ID from
deaddrop chat as input. As deaddrop chat is removed, this call can't
be used anymore.
- dc_msg_get_real_chat_id(): use dc_msg_get_chat_id() instead, the
only difference between these calls was in handling of deaddrop chat
- removed DC_CHAT_ID_DEADDROP and DC_STR_DEADDROP constants
See https://support.delta.chat/t/discussion-how-to-show-error-states/1363/10 <!-- comment -->
It turns out that it's pretty easy to distinguish between lots of states (currently Error/NotConnected, Connecting…, Getting new messages… and Connected). What's not that easy is distinguishing between an actual error and no network, because if the server just doesn't respond, it could mean that we don't have network or that we are trying ipv6, but only ipv4 works.
**WRT debouncing:**
Sending of EVENT_CONNECTIVITY_CHANGED is not debounced, but emitted every time one of the 3 threads (Inbox, Mvbox and Sentbox) has a network error, starts fetching data, or is done fetching data.
This means that it is emitted:
- 9 times when dc_maybe_network() is called or we get network connection
- 12 times when we lose network connection
Some measurements: dc_get_connectivity() takes a little more than 1ms (in my measurements back in March), dc_get_connectivity_html() takes 10-20ms. This means that it's no immmediate problem to call them very often, might increase battery drain though. For the UI it may be a lot of work to update the title everytime; at least Android is smart enough to update the title only once.
Possible problems (we don't have to worry about them now I think):
- Due to the scan_folders feature, if the user has lots of folders, the state could be "Connecting..." for quite a long time, generally DC seemed a little unresponsive to me because it took so long for "Connecting..." to go away. Telegram has a state "Updating..." that sometimes comes after "Connecting...".
To be done in other PRs:
- Better handle the case that the password was changed on the server and authenticating fails, see https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/1923 and https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/issues/1768
- maybe event debouncing (except for "Connected" connectivity events)
fix https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-android/issues/1760
New `dc_msg_is_bot()` C API and corresponding `Message.is_bot()`
Python API can be used to check if incoming message is sent by a bot,
e.g. to avoid two echo bots replying indefinitely to each other.
"Bot" flag is not set for outgoing messages, but may be set for
BCC-self messages. For now documentation says that `dc_msg_is_bot()`
return value is unspecified for outgoing messages. It can be better
specified later if needed for specific applications, e.g. sharing an
account with a helper bot.
* Add failing test for #2369
* Completely ignore Drafts folder
fix#2369
* Also ignore messages that have the Draft flag set but are not in the Drafts folder
There was a bugreport for previous versions of DC that BCC-self
messages are not marked as seen if server-side Sieve rule moves them.
This test is an unsuccessful attempt to reproduce the bug,
which was confirmed to be fixed.
This test checks that MDN is marked as seen on ac1. Because ac1 also
receives BCC-self, it is possible that event of marking this message
as seen is confused with marking MDN as seen, and the test passes even
if MDN is not marked as seen. Explicitly disabling BCC-self for ac1
ensures it receives only one message (MDN).
Also start direct_imap as early as possible, before sending the
message. It is possible now, because BCC-self is not sent.
When watch_inbox was off, scan_folders failed and a toast "IMAP operation attempted while it is torn down" was shown.
--
The problem was:
When inbox_watch is off, scan_folders() is called at 244260a978/src/scheduler.rs (L107) but connect_configured() is not called before.
* Add test
* Don't only setup handle, but connect_configured() in scan_folders()
The problem was:
If a message has the \Deleted flag set, we ignore it. But we forgot to
update last_uid, so that uid_next was not updated at 47e639b777/src/imap.rs (L730) and the same message was
fetched over and over again.
Fix#2429
This PR originally contained a fix for sqlx which turned out not not to be necessary. But on the way, I made some general improvements:
- Under some circumstances, a "normal" test failure led to a timeout, without printing a decent error message. See e.g. https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/deltachat/deltachat-core-rust/8069/workflows/ba2a9949-b4ad-4ceb-a930-073bba05e2db/jobs/30965.
(The problem was: if there is an exception in dc_account_extra_configure(), when trying to handle the exception the line account.log("===================", e, "===================") was called, which can't work as log() only expects one parameter)
- When a test fails: Call `dump_account_info()` even if there is no direct_imap
- In test_import_export_online_all(), add another 100KB file to the backup. This adds resilience against future size changes of the sql db file: The test tests the smoothness of the progress bar. And if there are there are not enough about-equally-sized files, the progress bar can't be smooth.
save subject for messages:
- new api `dc_msg_get_subject()`,
- when quoting, use the subject of the quoted message as the new subject, instead of the
last subject in the chat
fix#2254: if the DB was closed without calling stop_io() and then an interrupt arrives (e.g. incoming message), the db was corrupted.
* Add result.log() for logging with less boilerplate code
* Bugfix: Resultify housekeeping() to make it abort if the db is closed instead of just deleting everything
* Require the UI to call dc_stop_io() before backup export
* Prepare a bit better for closed-db: Resultify get_uidvalidity and get_uid_next and let job::load_next() wait until the db is open
About the bug (before this PR):
if the DB was closed without calling stop_io() and then an interrupt arrives (e.g. incoming message):
- I don't know if it downloads the message, but of course at some point the process of receiving the message will fail
- In my test, DC is just in the process of moving a message when the imex starts, but then can't delete the job or update the msg server_uid
- Then, when job::load_next() is called, no job can be loaded. That's why it calls `load_housekeeping_job()`. As `load_housekeeping_job()` can't load the time of the last housekeeping, it assumes we never ran housekeeping and returns a new Housekeeping job, which is immediately executed.
- housekeeping can't find any blobs referenced in the db and therefore deletes almost all blobs.
Now I know why the tests failed before 48c58a7 (i.e. after c923670) but
not on master (i.e. before c923670):
because of a bug, scan_folders() set the configured_sentbox to None if
it was set before. If it was None before, it restored the correct value.
On master, there was another bug that led to two runs of
scan_folders() being started at the same time. Therefore, the first run
set configured_sentbox to None, the second one restored the correct
value.
c923670 fixed the latter bug, so that only one run of scan_folders() was
started. Therefore, configured_sentbox stayed None incorrectly and
test_fetch_existing() failed.
48c58a7 fixed the former bug.
This commit adds checks to test_fetch_existing(), so that it definitely
checks for the former bug.
The following rules apply now:
1. "name" column is only updated manually and never over the network
2. "authname" column is only updated over the network and never manually
3. Displayname is a "name" if it is non-empty, otherwise it is "authname".
This fixes a known (pytest.xfail) problem of "name" being changed over
the network when user has set it to non-empty string manually.
This also fixes the problem when "name" and "authname"
became unsynchronized accidentally, when they were equal and then
Origin::IncomingUnknownTo update arrived, setting "name" but not
"authname". Rust regression test is added for this case.
Encryption preference was already applied since commit 78d855c5ca,
but only for already existing peerstates.
As a result, new users ignored gossiped encryption preference in the
"member added" message and had to wait until someone gossiped encryption
preferences for inactive users the second time.
