Fix https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/8250. Not sure why anyone
would tamper with the link, but maybe the name gets ellipsized because
it is very long, or maybe we decide to ellipsize more aggressively in
the future.
The fix is easy enough, just set the GroupNameTimestamp when creating
the channel, so that `HeaderDef::ChatGroupNameTimestamp` gets set when
sending a message and the logic in
`apply_chat_name_avatar_and_description_changes()` recognizes the
incoming name's timestamp as newer than `chat_group_name_timestamp`
(which is 0 right after joining a chat).
The test is somewhat hacky and depends on the title being the last
parameter in the invite code URL, but this is fine; if we ever change
that, then the test will fail and we need to modify it.
This also removes some wrong doc comments.
Since groups are unpromoted until sending a first message, the same fix isn't needed for groups.
We have recently removed it from the normal "message info" dialog
at least on Delta Chat Desktop, so without this one can't easily find
the ID of a particular message,
which is useful for debugging.
Follow-up to 970222f. We shouldn't update the message state to `OutDelivered` if message sending
failed before and the message was re-sent successfully only to a new broadcast member.
receive_imf should not fail in this case,
but trash the post-message and updates.
The problem with previously used message::rfc724_mid_exists check
was that rfc724_mid_exists may return a trashed message.
"[::1]" is not a hostname, but an IPv6 address,
and should be passed as "::1" to tokio::net functions.
Otherwise connecting to proxy addresses such as `socks5://[::1]:9150`
fails by trying to resolve IPv6 address with DNS.
Fix https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/8195
Supersedes https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/8217
The most interesting change is in `delete_expired_imap_messages()`
because there, messages are marked for deletion on single-device
chatmail profiles.
The logic in `delete_expired_imap_messages()` was wrong before, and
pre-messages were not deleted at all. This is fixed by also querying
`pre_rfc724_mid` in addition to `rfc724_mid` from the `msgs` table.
In order not to make the SQL statement too complex, I split it into two.
WRT tests:
- `test_immediate_autodelete()` tests the auto-deletion;
`test_imap_autodelete_fully_downloaded_msg()` tests that even for a
message that is split into pre- and post-message, both messages are
deleted.
- A lot of tests test that if bcc_self is on, messages are not
auto-deleted. E.g. `test_one_account_send_bcc_setting()` and
`test_markseen_message_and_mdn()` relies on the fact that messages stay
on the server when bcc_self is on.
- Unfortunately, it is not possible to test that messages are only
deleted for chatmail servers, because we don't have any tests that use a
non-chatmail server.
This info is added at the top of the logs
and we don't want users to send us the logs
with the key fingerprint for debugging,
it is not really useful but identifies the profile.
This also solves the problem with the fact that
it's not clear from the resulting HTML
that this error message is referring to quota and not something else.
See https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/8130.
This change is a preparation for ignoring
unencrypted messages by default.
New test_utils::encrypt_raw_message and
test_utils::receive_encrypted_imf are
used to encrypt the messages before
"receiving" them with receive_imf.
It turned out for desktop the style unicode-bidi: plaintext is needed.
dir="auto" didn't work. The style only without dir attribute worked too
but maybe it's better to have both. With this change
https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-desktop/issues/6345 is also
solved for long messages that have a "Show full message" dialog
We log all connection attempts errors as they fail already,
but once all attempts are exhausted, we only log the first error
without specifying which address failed.
The first error is frequently the least interesting
"Network is unreachable (os error 101)" that happens
when trying to connect to IPv6 address from
a network that does not support IPv6.
To make reading the logs easier,
log all errors together with the addresses
again once all connection attempts are exhausted.
Then it will be visible that IPv6 failed
with "Network is unreachable (os error 101)"
and IPv4 failed with "Connection timeout: deadline has elapsed"
or similar error.
Before the change error looked like this:
IMAP failed to connect to example.org:143:starttls: Connection failure: Network is unreachable (os error 101).
With the change the error looks like this:
IMAP failed to connect to example.org:143:starttls: All connection attempts failed: Connection to [***::1]:143 failed: Network is unreachable (os error 101); Connection to [***::2]:143 failed: Network is unreachable (os error 101); Connection to x.x.x.1:143 timed out: deadline has elapsed; Connection to x.x.x.2:143 timed out: deadline has elapsed; Connection to x.x.x.3:143 timed out: deadline has elapsed.
This is needed to have support of v6 PQC keys
by the time users start generating profiles
using such keys.
Test key was generated with rsop/v0.10.0-16-gd98265f
(commit d98265f821e7bb181d06da1d634c5c4668d89e83)
using the command
cargo run --features draft-pqc generate-key \
--profile draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-14-v6-ed25519-mlkem768x25519
This is not required by <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3156>.
Looks like Content-Description and Content-Disposition are
the same as what Thunderbird produces,
e.g. in `test-data/message/thunderbird_encrypted_signed.eml`,
and the same values also made it into Autocrypt spec.
Content-Description is likely not used by anyone.
For Content-Disposition specification see <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2183>.
While it is explicitly allowed to set the filename for inline attachment,
it does not look useful to specify generic "encrypted.asc" explicitly.
Content-Disposition for the second part results in some webmail clients
showing the second part as an attachment with "encrypted.asc" filename.
They will likely show it differently after this change,
e.g. with a different filename or actually inline.
`OutPreparing` is deprecated since 2024-12-07, replace it with `OutFailed`, such messages are
probably not interesting anymore. `OutMdnRcvd` is not used in the db for new messages since
a30c6ae1f7, `OutDelivered` is stored instead.
If we missed a message changing the primary transport, we shouldn't remove it when applying
a SyncTransports message, such a state doesn't look correct even if it's temporary.
Otherwise if it's forwarded to a device that already has the original
message, the pre-message isn't received and this results in a message
having no text and `Forwarded` param.
Co-authored-by: Hocuri <hocuri@gmx.de>
Currently, the Fingerprint type implements Display, but this doesn't get
you the canonical fingerprint representation, but something
human-readable. This is confusing, and back when I first used
`Fingerprint`, I immediately wrote a bug because of this. So, instead,
make a function `human_readable()` on Fingerprint.
This comes from the discussion at
https://github.com/chatmail/core/pull/8174#discussion_r3143130722.
Implementing `FromStr` and then calling `parse()` creates an
indirection, which is hard to follow for people who are not familiar
with Rust. @r10s recently voiced this problem when we were
pair-programming, and I agree.
We can decide what exactly to call the new function.
I didn't remove all `FromStr` implementations yet; `FromStr for
Fingerprint`, `FromStr for Params`, `FromStr for MozConfigTag` and
`FromStr for EphemeralTimer` are still left.
