Now MarkseenMsgOnImap sends MDN even if it can't mark the message as
seen on the server.
To prevent multiple MDNs from being sent, MarkseenMsgOnImap is postponed
until the message is detected in a folder from which it is not going to
be moved.
Add a mutex to prevent a race condition when a "your pw is wrong" warning is sent, resulting in multiple messeges being sent.
Do not mute the device chat but "only" send MsgsChanged event when no
notification shall be shown.
More logging.
Parallel processing of messages results in bugs such as messages sent by
a new member being processed before the message that adds this member to
the chat, even when it has lower UID. In this case, messages are shown as
"[Unknown sender for this chat. See 'info' for more details.]", while
there is a message "Member ... added" right before, because writing the
information about new member to the database takes longer then reading
old index from the database.
CLOSE, which was used previously, only expunges messages and deselects
folder, and it should only be called if some folder is selected. For that,
Imap.close_folder() method is used.
search for the sentbox in two passes:
- first check the folder attributes
- only if that fails, check for some known names
this way, the sent-attribute always has precedence
over the name; this was not the case before.
moreover, this fixes an possibly wrong early exist
when the attribute list is completely empty.
* First try making get_recipients use MailHeader (nice and functional)
* Get it to compile by using not-so-functional style
* Add "empty-from" test, drop unnecessary check for error; continue using addrparse_header() instead of addrparse()
* Try to use functional style, unfortunately, I can't get the compiler to accept it
* Do it imperative-style: Do not overwrite To with Cc and vice versa
* Use addrparse_header() once more
* Still addrparse_header()
* Clippy
* Fix compile errors in tests
* Fix typo
* Fix tests again ;-)
* Code style
* Code style; try a HashMap<addr: String, display_name: String> as an address list but I am not convinced
* Code style; Use Vec<SingleInfo> as address list
* Clippy
* Add tests
* Add another test
* Remove stale comments
If error is ignored, the message will never be fetched again, even if
there was a database write error.
dc_receive_imf itself is modified to ignore unrecoverable errors, to
prevent endless refetching of incorrect messages.
If precheck_imf fails to check if message with the same rfc724_mid
already exists, the same message may be downloaded twice. Instead,
abort the whole operation and retry later.
Alexander Krotov
Hocuri
holger krekel
bjoern
dignifiedquire
Hocuri