feat: Rename vb-request-v2 -> vb-request-with-auth

Turns out that Alice reacts to a request-v2 message in exactly the same
way as to a request-with-auth message. So, no need to distinguish here.
This commit is contained in:
Hocuri
2025-08-11 15:32:01 +02:00
parent 956519cd98
commit 9dc590cb35
5 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@@ -2948,7 +2948,7 @@ async fn prepare_send_msg(
.get_bool(Param::ForcePlaintext) .get_bool(Param::ForcePlaintext)
.unwrap_or_default() .unwrap_or_default()
// V2 securejoin messages are symmetrically encrypted, no need for the public key: // V2 securejoin messages are symmetrically encrypted, no need for the public key:
|| msg.securejoin_step() == Some("vb-request-v2") || msg.securejoin_step() == Some("vb-request-with-auth")
} }
_ => false, _ => false,
}; };

View File

@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ impl MimeFactory {
// messages are auto-sent unlike usual unencrypted messages. // messages are auto-sent unlike usual unencrypted messages.
step == "vg-request-with-auth" step == "vg-request-with-auth"
|| step == "vc-request-with-auth" || step == "vc-request-with-auth"
|| step == "vb-request-v2" || step == "vb-request-with-auth"
|| step == "vg-member-added" || step == "vg-member-added"
|| step == "vb-member-added" || step == "vb-member-added"
|| step == "vc-contact-confirm" || step == "vc-contact-confirm"
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ impl MimeFactory {
} else if let Loaded::Message { msg, .. } = &self.loaded { } else if let Loaded::Message { msg, .. } = &self.loaded {
if msg.param.get_cmd() == SystemMessage::SecurejoinMessage { if msg.param.get_cmd() == SystemMessage::SecurejoinMessage {
let step = msg.param.get(Param::Arg).unwrap_or_default(); let step = msg.param.get(Param::Arg).unwrap_or_default();
if step != "vg-request" && step != "vc-request" && step != "vb-request-v2" { if step != "vg-request" && step != "vc-request" && step != "vb-request-with-auth" {
headers.push(( headers.push((
"Auto-Submitted", "Auto-Submitted",
mail_builder::headers::raw::Raw::new("auto-replied".to_string()).into(), mail_builder::headers::raw::Raw::new("auto-replied".to_string()).into(),
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ impl MimeFactory {
headers.push(( headers.push((
if step == "vg-request-with-auth" if step == "vg-request-with-auth"
|| step == "vc-request-with-auth" || step == "vc-request-with-auth"
|| step == "vb-request-v2" || step == "vb-request-with-auth"
{ {
"Secure-Join-Auth" "Secure-Join-Auth"
} else { } else {
@@ -1916,7 +1916,7 @@ fn hidden_recipients() -> Address<'static> {
fn should_encrypt_with_auth_token(msg: &Message) -> bool { fn should_encrypt_with_auth_token(msg: &Message) -> bool {
msg.param.get_cmd() == SystemMessage::SecurejoinMessage msg.param.get_cmd() == SystemMessage::SecurejoinMessage
&& msg.param.get(Param::Arg).unwrap_or_default() == "vb-request-v2" && msg.param.get(Param::Arg).unwrap_or_default() == "vb-request-with-auth"
} }
fn should_encrypt_with_broadcast_secret(msg: &Message, chat: &Chat) -> bool { fn should_encrypt_with_broadcast_secret(msg: &Message, chat: &Chat) -> bool {

View File

@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ pub enum Param {
/// ///
/// For `BobHandshakeMsg::RequestWithAuth`, this is the `Secure-Join-Auth` header. /// For `BobHandshakeMsg::RequestWithAuth`, this is the `Secure-Join-Auth` header.
/// ///
/// For version two of the securejoin protocol (`vb-request-v2`), /// For version two of the securejoin protocol (`vb-request-with-auth`),
/// this is the Auth token used to encrypt the message. /// this is the Auth token used to encrypt the message.
/// ///
/// For [`SystemMessage::MultiDeviceSync`], this contains the ids that are synced. /// For [`SystemMessage::MultiDeviceSync`], this contains the ids that are synced.

View File

@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn handle_securejoin_handshake(
// -> or just ignore the problem for now - we will need to solve it for all messages anyways: https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/7057 // -> or just ignore the problem for now - we will need to solve it for all messages anyways: https://github.com/chatmail/core/issues/7057
if !matches!( if !matches!(
step, step,
"vg-request" | "vc-request" | "vb-request-v2" | "vb-member-added" "vg-request" | "vc-request" | "vb-request-with-auth" | "vb-member-added"
) { ) {
let mut self_found = false; let mut self_found = false;
let self_fingerprint = load_self_public_key(context).await?.dc_fingerprint(); let self_fingerprint = load_self_public_key(context).await?.dc_fingerprint();
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn handle_securejoin_handshake(
========================================================*/ ========================================================*/
bob::handle_auth_required(context, mime_message).await bob::handle_auth_required(context, mime_message).await
} }
"vg-request-with-auth" | "vc-request-with-auth" | "vb-request-v2" => { "vg-request-with-auth" | "vc-request-with-auth" | "vb-request-with-auth" => {
/*========================================================== /*==========================================================
==== Alice - the inviter side ==== ==== Alice - the inviter side ====
==== Steps 5+6 in "Setup verified contact" protocol ==== ==== Steps 5+6 in "Setup verified contact" protocol ====
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn handle_securejoin_handshake(
.await?; .await?;
inviter_progress(context, contact_id, 800); inviter_progress(context, contact_id, 800);
inviter_progress(context, contact_id, 1000); inviter_progress(context, contact_id, 1000);
if step == "vb-request-v2" { if step == "vb-request-with-auth" {
// For broadcasts, we don't want to delete the message, // For broadcasts, we don't want to delete the message,
// because the other device should also internally add the member // because the other device should also internally add the member
// and see the key (because it won't see the member via autocrypt-gossip). // and see the key (because it won't see the member via autocrypt-gossip).
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn observe_securejoin_on_other_device(
inviter_progress(context, contact_id, 1000); inviter_progress(context, contact_id, 1000);
} }
// TODO not sure if I should add vb-request-v2 here // TODO not sure if I should add vb-request-with-auth here
// Actually, I'm not even sure why vg-request-with-auth is here - why do we create a 1:1 chat?? // Actually, I'm not even sure why vg-request-with-auth is here - why do we create a 1:1 chat??
if step == "vg-request-with-auth" || step == "vc-request-with-auth" { if step == "vg-request-with-auth" || step == "vc-request-with-auth" {
// This actually reflects what happens on the first device (which does the secure // This actually reflects what happens on the first device (which does the secure

View File

@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@ pub(super) async fn start_protocol(context: &Context, invite: QrInvite) -> Resul
let mut msg = Message { let mut msg = Message {
viewtype: Viewtype::Text, viewtype: Viewtype::Text,
// TODO I may want to make this generic also for group/contacts // TODO I may want to make this generic also for group/contacts
text: "Secure-Join: vb-request-v2".to_string(), text: "Secure-Join: vb-request-with-auth".to_string(),
hidden: true, hidden: true,
..Default::default() ..Default::default()
}; };
msg.param.set_cmd(SystemMessage::SecurejoinMessage); msg.param.set_cmd(SystemMessage::SecurejoinMessage);
msg.param.set(Param::Arg, "vb-request-v2"); msg.param.set(Param::Arg, "vb-request-with-auth");
msg.param.set(Param::Arg2, invite.authcode()); msg.param.set(Param::Arg2, invite.authcode());
msg.param.set_int(Param::GuaranteeE2ee, 1); msg.param.set_int(Param::GuaranteeE2ee, 1);
let bob_fp = self_fingerprint(context).await?; let bob_fp = self_fingerprint(context).await?;
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn send_handshake_message(
pub(crate) enum BobHandshakeMsg { pub(crate) enum BobHandshakeMsg {
/// vc-request or vg-request /// vc-request or vg-request
Request, Request,
/// vc-request-with-auth, vg-request-with-auth, or vb-request-v2 /// vc-request-with-auth, vg-request-with-auth, or vb-request-with-auth
RequestWithAuth, RequestWithAuth,
} }